Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Evm equivalence in yul #364

Closed
wants to merge 691 commits into from
Closed

feat: Evm equivalence in yul #364

wants to merge 691 commits into from

Conversation

jrchatruc
Copy link
Contributor

What ❔

This PR adds an EVM Yul Interpreter on top of the already existing Solidity EVM Interpreter effort

Why ❔

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.

@jrchatruc jrchatruc changed the base branch from main to dev April 15, 2024 14:28
@jrchatruc jrchatruc changed the base branch from dev to sb-1-5-0-evm-eq-integration April 16, 2024 15:50
Instead of using loop to store bytes for OP_CODECOPY,
call optimized memcpy function.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Radosavljevic <[email protected]>
Instead, call mcopy that is is essentially
optimized implementation of memmove. Add
checks for memory overflow.

This patch is a joint work by:
Gianbelinche <[email protected]>
Vladimir Radosavljevic <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Radosavljevic <[email protected]>
…heck

[EVM-Equivalence-YUL] Check offset overflow earlier in memory opcodes
[EVM-Equivalence-YUL] Execute JUMPDEST immediately after JUMP/JUMPI
[EVM-Equivalence-YUL] Remove pop push check
[EVM-Equivalence-YUL] Remove calls to mstore8
…-of-calls-for-precompiles

[EVM Equivalence in Yul] fix: Don't charge the regular cost of the call when calling precompiles
[EVM-Equivalence-YUL] Remove TODOs
…ations

[EVM-Equivalence-YUL] Interpeter optimizations
…dCodeLen

[EVM-Equivalence-YUL] Simplify EXTCODESIZE
[EVM-Equivalence-YUL] Implement evmCodeHash without mapping
@jrchatruc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed in favor of #685

@jrchatruc jrchatruc closed this Sep 17, 2024
@jrchatruc jrchatruc mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
3 tasks
@0xVolosnikov 0xVolosnikov deleted the evm-equivalence-yul branch September 27, 2024 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants