Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Chain registrar #1064
base: release-v25-protocol-defense
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[WIP] Chain registrar #1064
Changes from 13 commits
9c3118c
9fd56a3
0589a9b
ca8edff
0e9e30d
e4b0c85
1804692
9294bac
5579d5a
43b788e
9c148cc
7610082
567abc5
863a189
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check failure on line 53 in l1-contracts/contracts/chain-registrar/ChainRegistrar.sol
GitHub Actions / lint
Check failure on line 53 in l1-contracts/contracts/chain-registrar/ChainRegistrar.sol
GitHub Actions / lint
Check failure on line 53 in l1-contracts/contracts/chain-registrar/ChainRegistrar.sol
GitHub Actions / lint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we also think about returning base token once the registration is done ? :D
idk, if it makes sense to keep author there...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, we need some token to operate on chain in the future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe adding more validations on
gasPriceMultiplierNominator
, I'd say at min check both values are 1, 1 if base token is ETHThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, you can do that without specifying class?
IL1SharedBridge(bridgehub.sharedBridge()).l2BridgeAddress(chainId);
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we can. Because it's already specified.