boilerplate code #9
Conversation
WalkthroughThe updates introduce a new Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (18)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/controllers/jobs_controller.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/da_job/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/mod.rs (4 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/register_proof_job/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/snos_job/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/state_update_job/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/types.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/main.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/tests/jobs/da_job/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/workers/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/workers/proof_registration.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/workers/proving.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/workers/snos.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/orchestrator/src/workers/update_state.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/settlement_clients/settlement-client-interface/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crates/settlement_clients/settlement-client-interface/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- Cargo.toml
- crates/orchestrator/src/workers/mod.rs
- crates/settlement_clients/settlement-client-interface/Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (11)
crates/orchestrator/src/lib.rs (1)
18-18: Addition ofworkersmodule.The addition of the
workersmodule is well-placed and aligns with the architectural expansion to include worker functionalities.crates/settlement_clients/settlement-client-interface/src/lib.rs (2)
7-13: TheSettlementVerificationStatusenum is well-defined with appropriate variants. Ensure that the#[allow(dead_code)]attribute is only temporary until these variants are used in the codebase.
19-37: TheSettlementClienttrait is well-structured with clear async method definitions. Ensure that all implementations of this trait handle theResulttype correctly to manage errors effectively.crates/orchestrator/src/main.rs (2)
6-10: The imports for the new worker types are correctly added. Ensure that these workers are properly integrated and tested within the system.
29-36: Thestart_cronfunction calls are correctly set up for the new workers. Ensure that the interval settings are appropriate for the system's performance and requirements.crates/orchestrator/src/tests/jobs/da_job/mod.rs (1)
25-25: The test forcreate_jobin theDaJobmodule is updated to include themetadataparameter. Ensure that the test adequately covers all scenarios related to metadata handling.crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/types.rs (2)
78-78: RenamingProofVerificationtoProofRegistrationaligns with the updated functionality. Ensure all references to the old enum name are updated throughout the codebase.Verification successful
All references to
ProofVerificationhave been successfully updated toProofRegistrationthroughout the codebase.
crates/orchestrator/src/main.rscrates/orchestrator/src/workers/proof_registration.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/types.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/state_update_job/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/register_proof_job/mod.rsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `ProofVerification` are updated to `ProofRegistration`. # Test: Search for the old enum name. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type rust 'ProofVerification'Length of output: 34
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `ProofVerification` are updated to `ProofRegistration`. # Test: Search for the new enum name. Expect: Occurrences in relevant places. rg --type rust 'ProofRegistration'Length of output: 694
72-72: Addition ofSnosRuntoJobTypeenum. Ensure it is integrated properly in job creation and processing logic.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
SnosRunis integrated into theJobTypeenum and is used in the job creation logic withinsnos_job/mod.rs. However, to ensure comprehensive integration, we should verify its usage in job processing functions as well.
The search results confirm that
SnosRunis integrated into the job creation logic and is also referenced in the job processing function withinsnos_job/mod.rs. This indicates thatSnosRunis properly integrated into the job-related functionalities.
JobType::SnosRunis used in the job creation function.- The job processing function mentions steps related to processing SNOS jobs.
This suggests that the integration of
SnosRunis consistent and complete.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration of `SnosRun` in job-related functionalities. # Test: Search for `SnosRun` usage in job creation and processing. Expect: Proper integration. rg --type rust 'SnosRun'Length of output: 160
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration of `SnosRun` in job-related functionalities. # Test: Search for `SnosRun` usage in job creation and processing functions. rg --type rust 'SnosRun' -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 1586
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration of `SnosRun` in job processing functions. # Test: Search for `SnosRun` usage in job processing functions. rg --type rust 'SnosRun' -A 10 -B 10Length of output: 3093
crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/da_job/mod.rs (1)
17-29: The addition ofmetadataparameter increate_jobmethod enhances job handling flexibility. Ensure it is properly utilized in job processing and related areas.Verification successful
The
metadataparameter is well-integrated and utilized across various parts of the codebase, including job creation and processing functions.
crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/da_job/mod.rs:metadatais passed and used in job creation.crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/mod.rs:metadatais used in job creation and processing functions.crates/orchestrator/src/database/mod.rs:metadatais used in database update functions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `metadata` parameter in job processing. # Test: Search for `metadata` usage in job processing. Expect: Proper utilization. rg --type rust 'metadata'Length of output: 6737
crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/mod.rs (2)
Line range hint
51-64: Modification ofcreate_jobto includemetadataparameter. Ensure this change is reflected in all job handling and processing logic.Verification successful
The
metadataparameter has been integrated into various parts of the job handling and processing logic, as evidenced by the multiple instances found in thergoutput.
- crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/mod.rs
- crates/orchestrator/src/database/mongodb/mod.rs
- crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/state_update_job/mod.rs
- crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/register_proof_job/mod.rs
These instances confirm that the
metadataparameter is properly utilized across the relevant modules.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `metadata` parameter in job handling. # Test: Search for `metadata` usage in job handling. Expect: Proper integration. rg --type rust 'metadata'Length of output: 6737
15-17: Addition of new job modules (register_proof_job,snos_job,state_update_job). Ensure these modules are properly integrated and utilized within the orchestrator.
| pub trait SettlementConfig { | ||
| /// Should create a new instance of the DaConfig from the environment variables | ||
| fn new_from_env() -> Self; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The SettlementConfig trait method new_from_env is a good approach for environment-based configuration. Consider adding error handling or logging to capture issues during environment variable parsing.
| pub struct SnosJob; | ||
|
|
||
| #[async_trait] | ||
| impl Job for SnosJob { | ||
| async fn create_job( | ||
| &self, | ||
| _config: &Config, | ||
| internal_id: String, | ||
| metadata: HashMap<String, String>, | ||
| ) -> Result<JobItem> { | ||
| Ok(JobItem { | ||
| id: Uuid::new_v4(), | ||
| internal_id, | ||
| job_type: JobType::SnosRun, | ||
| status: JobStatus::Created, | ||
| external_id: String::new().into(), | ||
| metadata, | ||
| version: 0, | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async fn process_job(&self, _config: &Config, _job: &JobItem) -> Result<String> { | ||
| // 1. Fetch SNOS input data from Madara | ||
| // 2. Import SNOS in Rust and execute it with the input data | ||
| // 3. Store the received PIE in DB | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async fn verify_job(&self, _config: &Config, _job: &JobItem) -> Result<JobVerificationStatus> { | ||
| // No need for verification as of now. If we later on decide to outsource SNOS run | ||
| // to another servicehow a, verify_job can be used to poll on the status of the job | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn max_process_attempts(&self) -> u64 { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn max_verification_attempts(&self) -> u64 { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn verification_polling_delay_seconds(&self) -> u64 { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The SnosJob struct and its methods are well implemented. However, the todo!() placeholders in methods like process_job and verify_job indicate incomplete implementation. Ensure these are addressed before merging.
| pub struct RegisterProofJob; | ||
|
|
||
| #[async_trait] | ||
| impl Job for RegisterProofJob { | ||
| async fn create_job( | ||
| &self, | ||
| _config: &Config, | ||
| internal_id: String, | ||
| metadata: HashMap<String, String>, | ||
| ) -> Result<JobItem> { | ||
| Ok(JobItem { | ||
| id: Uuid::new_v4(), | ||
| internal_id, | ||
| job_type: JobType::ProofRegistration, | ||
| status: JobStatus::Created, | ||
| external_id: String::new().into(), | ||
| // metadata must contain the blocks that have been included inside this proof | ||
| // this will allow state update jobs to be created for each block | ||
| metadata, | ||
| version: 0, | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async fn process_job(&self, _config: &Config, _job: &JobItem) -> Result<String> { | ||
| // Get proof from S3 and submit on chain for verification | ||
| // We need to implement a generic trait for this to support multiple | ||
| // base layers | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async fn verify_job(&self, _config: &Config, _job: &JobItem) -> Result<JobVerificationStatus> { | ||
| // verify that the proof transaction has been included on chain | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn max_process_attempts(&self) -> u64 { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn max_verification_attempts(&self) -> u64 { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn verification_polling_delay_seconds(&self) -> u64 { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The RegisterProofJob struct and its methods are well implemented. However, the todo!() placeholders in methods like process_job and verify_job indicate incomplete implementation. Ensure these are addressed before merging.
| pub struct StateUpdateJob; | ||
|
|
||
| #[async_trait] | ||
| impl Job for StateUpdateJob { | ||
| async fn create_job( | ||
| &self, | ||
| _config: &Config, | ||
| internal_id: String, | ||
| metadata: HashMap<String, String>, | ||
| ) -> Result<JobItem> { | ||
| Ok(JobItem { | ||
| id: Uuid::new_v4(), | ||
| internal_id, | ||
| job_type: JobType::ProofRegistration, | ||
| status: JobStatus::Created, | ||
| external_id: String::new().into(), | ||
| // metadata must contain the blocks for which state update will be performed | ||
| // we don't do one job per state update as that makes nonce management complicated | ||
| metadata, | ||
| version: 0, | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async fn process_job(&self, _config: &Config, _job: &JobItem) -> Result<String> { | ||
| // Read the metadata to get the blocks for which state update will be performed. | ||
| // For each block, get the program output (from the PIE?) and the | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async fn verify_job(&self, _config: &Config, _job: &JobItem) -> Result<JobVerificationStatus> { | ||
| // verify that the proof transaction has been included on chain | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn max_process_attempts(&self) -> u64 { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn max_verification_attempts(&self) -> u64 { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn verification_polling_delay_seconds(&self) -> u64 { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The StateUpdateJob struct and its methods are well implemented. However, the todo!() placeholders in methods like process_job and verify_job indicate incomplete implementation. Ensure these are addressed before merging.
| /// 1. Fetch all successful SNOS job runs that don't have a proving job | ||
| /// 2. Create a proving job for each SNOS job run | ||
| async fn run_worker(&self) { | ||
| todo!() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implementation pending in run_worker.
The run_worker method is currently not implemented and contains a todo!() placeholder. Would you like me to help with the implementation or should we track this as an issue on GitHub?
| /// 1. Fetch the latest completed block from the Starknet chain | ||
| /// 2. Fetch the last block that had a SNOS job run. | ||
| /// 3. Create SNOS run jobs for all the remaining blocks | ||
| async fn run_worker(&self) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implementation pending in run_worker.
The run_worker method is currently not implemented and contains a todo!() placeholder. Would you like me to help with the implementation or should we track this as an issue on GitHub?
| /// 1. Fetch all blocks with a successful proving job run | ||
| /// 2. Group blocks that have the same proof | ||
| /// 3. For each group, create a proof registration job with from and to block in metadata | ||
| async fn run_worker(&self) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implementation pending in run_worker.
The run_worker method is currently not implemented and contains a todo!() placeholder. Would you like me to help with the implementation or should we track this as an issue on GitHub?
| /// 1. Fetch the last succesful state update job | ||
| /// 2. Fetch all succesful proving jobs covering blocks after the last state update | ||
| /// 3. Create state updates for all the blocks that don't have a state update job | ||
| async fn run_worker(&self) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implementation pending in run_worker.
The run_worker method is currently not implemented and contains a todo!() placeholder. Would you like me to help with the implementation or should we track this as an issue on GitHub?
| @@ -16,6 +17,6 @@ pub struct CreateJobRequest { | |||
|
|
|||
| /// Create a job | |||
| pub async fn create_job(Json(payload): Json<CreateJobRequest>) -> Result<Json<()>, AppError> { | |||
| crate::jobs::create_job(payload.job_type, payload.internal_id).await?; | |||
| crate::jobs::create_job(payload.job_type, payload.internal_id, HashMap::new()).await?; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The results indicate that the create_job function is being called with the new metadata parameter in the relevant files. Specifically, the instances in crates/orchestrator/src/tests/jobs/da_job/mod.rs and crates/orchestrator/src/controllers/jobs_controller.rs show the correct usage with HashMap::new().
However, there are several instances where create_job is defined but not called with the new parameter, such as in crates/orchestrator/src/database/mongodb/mod.rs, crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/state_update_job/mod.rs, crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/snos_job/mod.rs, and crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/register_proof_job/mod.rs. These instances need to be reviewed to ensure they are updated to use the new signature.
Action Required:
Please update the following files to ensure that all calls to create_job include the new metadata parameter:
crates/orchestrator/src/database/mongodb/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/state_update_job/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/snos_job/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/register_proof_job/mod.rs
Analysis chain
Modification to create_job to include metadata.
The addition of a metadata parameter in create_job is consistent with the expanded functionality. Please ensure that all calls to this function across the codebase have been updated to pass the necessary metadata.
Modification to create_job to include metadata.
The addition of a metadata parameter in create_job is consistent with the expanded functionality. Please ensure that all calls to this function across the codebase have been updated to pass the necessary metadata.
The output from the script shows multiple occurrences of create_job across different files. To ensure all calls to create_job have been updated to include the new metadata parameter, we need to inspect these occurrences more closely.
Next Steps:
- Verify that all instances of
create_jobin the codebase are using the new signature with the metadata parameter. - Specifically check the following files for correct usage:
crates/orchestrator/src/tests/jobs/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/tests/jobs/da_job/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/routes.rscrates/orchestrator/src/database/mongodb/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/state_update_job/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/snos_job/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/register_proof_job/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/jobs/da_job/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/database/mod.rscrates/orchestrator/src/controllers/jobs_controller.rs
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `create_job` include the new metadata parameter.
# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances with the new signature.
rg --type rust $'create_job'
Length of output: 1756
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `create_job` include the new metadata parameter.
# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances with the new signature.
rg --type rust $'create_job'
Length of output: 1756
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that all instances of `create_job` in the codebase are using the new signature with the metadata parameter.
# Check each file for the correct usage of `create_job`.
files=(
"crates/orchestrator/src/tests/jobs/mod.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/tests/jobs/da_job/mod.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/routes.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/database/mongodb/mod.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/mod.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/state_update_job/mod.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/snos_job/mod.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/register_proof_job/mod.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/jobs/da_job/mod.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/database/mod.rs"
"crates/orchestrator/src/controllers/jobs_controller.rs"
)
for file in "${files[@]}"; do
echo "Checking $file"
rg 'create_job\(' "$file"
done
Length of output: 3664
* boilerplate code * fix taplo * fmt fix
* boilerplate code * fix taplo * fmt fix
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
JobTypeenum with new variants.Documentation