Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Structure Block Registry Processor #626

Merged

Conversation

Dweblenod
Copy link
Member

Made changes to StructureBlockRegistryProcessor which allows StructureBlockRegistry to be called within finalizeProcess(). This makes it viable for use directly in a template_pool, meaning the structure block registry is suitable for jigsaw structures!

An example structure has been included for review purposes. It will need to be removed before merging.

… block registry internally. In the middle of testing issues with any/all processors in the template pool of the testing structure
@Dweblenod Dweblenod added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 30, 2024
@Dweblenod Dweblenod requested a review from kirderf1 June 30, 2024 17:48
- Made StructureBlockRegistryProcessor final
Copy link
Member

@kirderf1 kirderf1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks all good. Do you think there's a point in noting this as a datapack feature in the changelog?

@kirderf1
Copy link
Member

With everything else fine, the test structure ought to be removed.

- Removed test structure
@Dweblenod
Copy link
Member Author

With everything else fine, the test structure ought to be removed.

Removed the structure files but did keep the (unused) processor_list under the assumption it can be used in the near future

@kirderf1 kirderf1 merged commit 78c93eb into lunar-sway:main Jun 30, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants