Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[libc] Add erase function to blockstore #98674

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

michaelrj-google
Copy link
Contributor

Reland of #97641 with sanitizer fixes

This adds the ability to erase a value from a blockstore based on an
iterator. For usability/testing purposes it also includes an addition
operator for blockstore's iterator.

This adds the ability to erase a value from a blockstore based on an
iterator. For usability/testing purposes it also includes an addition
operator for blockstore's iterator.
@llvmbot llvmbot added the libc label Jul 12, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Jul 12, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-libc

Author: Michael Jones (michaelrj-google)

Changes

Reland of #97641 with sanitizer fixes

This adds the ability to erase a value from a blockstore based on an
iterator. For usability/testing purposes it also includes an addition
operator for blockstore's iterator.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98674.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) libc/src/__support/blockstore.h (+55-2)
  • (modified) libc/test/src/__support/blockstore_test.cpp (+98)
diff --git a/libc/src/__support/blockstore.h b/libc/src/__support/blockstore.h
index 8d13e0ed290df..efe2234eace59 100644
--- a/libc/src/__support/blockstore.h
+++ b/libc/src/__support/blockstore.h
@@ -9,9 +9,11 @@
 #ifndef LLVM_LIBC_SRC___SUPPORT_BLOCKSTORE_H
 #define LLVM_LIBC_SRC___SUPPORT_BLOCKSTORE_H
 
+#include "src/__support/CPP/array.h"
+#include "src/__support/CPP/new.h"
+#include "src/__support/CPP/type_traits.h"
+#include "src/__support/libc_assert.h"
 #include "src/__support/macros/config.h"
-#include <src/__support/CPP/new.h>
-#include <src/__support/libc_assert.h>
 
 #include <stddef.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
@@ -98,6 +100,16 @@ class BlockStore {
       return *reinterpret_cast<T *>(block->data + sizeof(T) * true_index);
     }
 
+    LIBC_INLINE Iterator operator+(int i) {
+      LIBC_ASSERT(i >= 0 &&
+                  "BlockStore iterators only support incrementation.");
+      auto other = *this;
+      for (int j = 0; j < i; ++j)
+        ++other;
+
+      return other;
+    }
+
     LIBC_INLINE bool operator==(const Iterator &rhs) const {
       return block == rhs.block && index == rhs.index;
     }
@@ -176,6 +188,47 @@ class BlockStore {
     else
       return Iterator(current, fill_count);
   }
+
+  // Removes the element at pos, then moves all the objects after back by one to
+  // fill the hole. It's assumed that pos is a valid iterator to somewhere in
+  // this block_store.
+  LIBC_INLINE void erase(Iterator pos) {
+    const Iterator last_item = Iterator(current, fill_count);
+    if (pos == last_item) {
+      pop_back();
+      return;
+    }
+
+    if constexpr (REVERSE_ORDER) {
+      // REVERSE: Iterate from begin to pos
+      const Iterator range_end = pos;
+      Iterator cur = begin();
+      T prev_val = *cur;
+      ++cur;
+      T cur_val = *cur;
+
+      for (; cur != range_end; ++cur) {
+        cur_val = *cur;
+        *cur = prev_val;
+        prev_val = cur_val;
+      }
+      // As long as this isn't the end we will always need to move at least one
+      // item (since we know that pos isn't the last item due to the check
+      // above).
+      if (range_end != end())
+        *cur = prev_val;
+    } else {
+      // FORWARD: Iterate from pos to end
+      const Iterator range_end = end();
+      Iterator cur = pos;
+      Iterator prev = cur;
+      ++cur;
+
+      for (; cur != range_end; prev = cur, ++cur)
+        *prev = *cur;
+    }
+    pop_back();
+  }
 };
 
 template <typename T, size_t BLOCK_SIZE, bool REVERSE_ORDER>
diff --git a/libc/test/src/__support/blockstore_test.cpp b/libc/test/src/__support/blockstore_test.cpp
index 5fe8fef1b6edc..dd74ea18f2c02 100644
--- a/libc/test/src/__support/blockstore_test.cpp
+++ b/libc/test/src/__support/blockstore_test.cpp
@@ -64,6 +64,99 @@ class LlvmLibcBlockStoreTest : public LIBC_NAMESPACE::testing::Test {
     }
     block_store.destroy(&block_store);
   }
+
+  template <bool REVERSE> void erase_test() {
+    using LIBC_NAMESPACE::BlockStore;
+    BlockStore<int, 2, REVERSE> block_store;
+    int i;
+
+    constexpr int ARR_SIZE = 6;
+
+    ASSERT_TRUE(block_store.empty());
+    for (int i = 0; i < ARR_SIZE; i++) {
+      ASSERT_TRUE(block_store.push_back(i + 1));
+    }
+
+    // block_store state should be {1,2,3,4,5,6}
+
+    block_store.erase(block_store.begin());
+
+    // FORWARD: block_store state should be {2,3,4,5,6}
+    // REVERSE: block_store state should be {1,2,3,4,5}
+
+    auto iter = block_store.begin();
+    for (i = 0; iter != block_store.end(); ++i, ++iter) {
+      if (!REVERSE) {
+        ASSERT_EQ(*iter, i + 2);
+      } else {
+        ASSERT_EQ(*iter, (ARR_SIZE - 1) - i);
+      }
+    }
+
+    // Assert that there were the correct number of elements
+    ASSERT_EQ(i, ARR_SIZE - 1);
+
+    block_store.erase(block_store.end());
+
+    // BOTH: block_store state should be {2,3,4,5}
+
+    iter = block_store.begin();
+    for (i = 0; iter != block_store.end(); ++i, ++iter) {
+      if (!REVERSE) {
+        ASSERT_EQ(*iter, i + 2);
+      } else {
+        ASSERT_EQ(*iter, (ARR_SIZE - 1) - i);
+      }
+    }
+
+    ASSERT_EQ(i, ARR_SIZE - 2);
+
+    block_store.erase(block_store.begin() + 1);
+
+    // FORWARD: block_store state should be {2,4,5}
+    // REVERSE: block_store state should be {2,3,5}
+
+    const int FORWARD_RESULTS[] = {2, 4, 5};
+    const int REVERSE_RESULTS[] = {2, 3, 5};
+
+    iter = block_store.begin();
+    for (i = 0; iter != block_store.end(); ++i, ++iter) {
+      if (!REVERSE) {
+        ASSERT_EQ(*iter, FORWARD_RESULTS[i]);
+      } else {
+        ASSERT_EQ(*iter, REVERSE_RESULTS[ARR_SIZE - 4 - i]); // reversed
+      }
+    }
+
+    ASSERT_EQ(i, ARR_SIZE - 3);
+
+    block_store.erase(block_store.begin() + 1);
+    // BOTH: block_store state should be {2,5}
+
+    iter = block_store.begin();
+    if (!REVERSE) {
+      ASSERT_EQ(*iter, 2);
+      ASSERT_EQ(*(iter + 1), 5);
+    } else {
+      ASSERT_EQ(*iter, 5);
+      ASSERT_EQ(*(iter + 1), 2);
+    }
+
+    block_store.erase(block_store.begin());
+    // FORWARD: block_store state should be {5}
+    // REVERSE: block_store state should be {2}
+    iter = block_store.begin();
+    if (!REVERSE) {
+      ASSERT_EQ(*iter, 5);
+    } else {
+      ASSERT_EQ(*iter, 2);
+    }
+
+    block_store.erase(block_store.begin());
+    // BOTH: block_store state should be {}
+
+    block_store.destroy(&block_store);
+  }
 };
 
 TEST_F(LlvmLibcBlockStoreTest, PopulateAndIterate4) {
@@ -100,3 +193,8 @@ TEST_F(LlvmLibcBlockStoreTest, Empty) {
   empty_test<false>();
   empty_test<true>();
 }
+
+TEST_F(LlvmLibcBlockStoreTest, Erase) {
+  erase_test<false>();
+  erase_test<true>();
+}

@michaelrj-google michaelrj-google changed the title libcBlockstoreErase [libc] Add erase function to blockstore Jul 12, 2024
@michaelrj-google michaelrj-google merged commit eb27256 into llvm:main Jul 12, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
aaryanshukla pushed a commit to aaryanshukla/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2024
Reland of llvm#97641 with sanitizer fixes

This adds the ability to erase a value from a blockstore based on an
iterator. For usability/testing purposes it also includes an addition
operator for blockstore's iterator.
aaryanshukla pushed a commit to aaryanshukla/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
Reland of llvm#97641 with sanitizer fixes

This adds the ability to erase a value from a blockstore based on an
iterator. For usability/testing purposes it also includes an addition
operator for blockstore's iterator.
@nickdesaulniers
Copy link
Member

IIRC this is handy for the dlclose itanium ABI function.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants