Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config(raster): update gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle_2023_0.2m #793

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 26, 2023

Conversation

rebclarke
Copy link
Contributor

feat(aerial): update Gisborne Cyclone Gabrielle imagery in Aerial and Event Cyclone Gabrielle config

@rebclarke rebclarke requested review from a team as code owners September 15, 2023 04:06
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Aerial Config Inserts

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle_2023_0.2m

Individual Layer Updates

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle-2023-0.2m

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Aerial Config Inserts

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle_2023_0.2m

Individual Layer Updates

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle-2023-0.2m

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Aerial Config Inserts

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle_2023_0.2m

Individual Layer Updates

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle-2023-0.2m

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Aerial Config Inserts

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle_2023_0.2m

Individual Layer Updates

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle-2023-0.2m

config/tileset/aerial.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Aerial Config Inserts

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle_2023_0.2m

Individual Layer Updates

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle-2023-0.2m

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Aerial Config Updates

-- Aerial
-- Aerial

gisborne-cyclone-gabrielle-2023-0.2m

@dwsilk dwsilk added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 26, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit 685dfb1 Sep 26, 2023
4 checks passed
@dwsilk dwsilk deleted the update-gisborne-cyclone-imagery branch September 26, 2023 03:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants