-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New bugs 2 #8
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
New bugs 2 #8
Conversation
PavelLinearB
commented
Jun 6, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Orca Security Scan Summary
Status | Check | Issues by priority |
---|---|---|
Passed | Infrastructure as Code | 0 0 0 0 |
Passed | Vulnerabilities | 0 0 0 0 |
Passed | Secrets | 0 0 0 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ Jit has detected 3 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The findings are detailed below as separate comments.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merge.
val="" | ||
val=login.objects.raw(sql_query) | ||
val=login.objects.raw(sql_query) | ||
val=login.objects.raw(sql_query) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Python Semgrep
Type: Gitlab.Bandit.B611
Description: You should be very careful whenever you write raw SQL. Consider using Django ORM before raw SQL. See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/topics/db/sql/#passing-parameters-into-raw
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fp
Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_accept
Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_undo_ignore
Undo ignore command
@@ -156,7 +156,9 @@ | |||
print(sql_query) | |||
try: | |||
print("\nin try\n") | |||
val="" | |||
val=login.objects.raw(sql_query) | |||
val=login.objects.raw(sql_query) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Python Semgrep
Type: Gitlab.Bandit.B611
Description: You should be very careful whenever you write raw SQL. Consider using Django ORM before raw SQL. See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/topics/db/sql/#passing-parameters-into-raw
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fp
Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_accept
Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_undo_ignore
Undo ignore command
@@ -156,7 +156,9 @@ | |||
print(sql_query) | |||
try: | |||
print("\nin try\n") | |||
val="" | |||
val=login.objects.raw(sql_query) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Python Semgrep
Type: Gitlab.Bandit.B611
Description: You should be very careful whenever you write raw SQL. Consider using Django ORM before raw SQL. See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/topics/db/sql/#passing-parameters-into-raw
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fp
Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_accept
Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_undo_ignore
Undo ignore command
This PR failed due to High severity vulnerability finding, if you don't fix it please select:
|
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. 6 Bugs No Coverage information |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Orca Security Scan Summary
Status | Check | Issues by priority | |
---|---|---|---|
Passed | Infrastructure as Code | 0 0 0 0 | View in Orca |
Passed | Vulnerabilities | 0 0 0 0 | View in Orca |
Passed | Secrets | 0 0 0 0 | View in Orca |
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions 1 Security Hotspot See analysis details on SonarCloud Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint |
@@ -210,6 +210,11 @@ | |||
# @authentication_decorator | |||
@csrf_exempt | |||
def mitre_lab_25_api(request): | |||
if request.method == "POST": | |||
expression = request.POST.get('expression') | |||
result = eval(expression) |
Check failure
Code scanning / SonarCloud
Dynamic code execution should not be vulnerable to injection attacks High
This PR failed due to High severity vulnerability finding, if you don't fix it please select:
|