Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

igt-gpu-tools_git.bb: remove net-snmp #81

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arthur-she
Copy link

net-snmp is used for sending command to PDU to power cycle the
Chamelium. It is not necessary for igt-gpu-tools, so remove it for the
recipe.

Signed-off-by: Arthur [email protected]

net-snmp is used for sending command to PDU to power cycle the
Chamelium. It is not necessary for igt-gpu-tools, so remove it for the
recipe.

Signed-off-by: Arthur <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@petegriffin petegriffin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense not to include here (unless we merge support to i-g-t for controlling Chamelium power). However don't we still need this in the final image somehow? Does it need to be added to a packagegroup test group (e.g. something like https://github.com/96boards/meta-rpb/blob/master/recipes-samples/packagegroups/packagegroup-rpb-tests-weston.bb)

@arthur-she
Copy link
Author

Makes sense not to include here (unless we merge support to i-g-t for controlling Chamelium power). However don't we still need this in the final image somehow? Does it need to be added to a packagegroup test group (e.g. something like https://github.com/96boards/meta-rpb/blob/master/recipes-samples/packagegroups/packagegroup-rpb-tests-weston.bb)

We do need it in the image. To add it to a packagegroup would be a good idea, just not sure which one is better. packagegroup-rpb-tests.bb or packagegroup-rpb-tests-weston.bb?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants