feat: amino support to manifest #98
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve the comprehensive removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #98 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 76.63% 77.57% +0.93%
==========================================
Files 34 33 -1
Lines 1802 1712 -90
==========================================
- Hits 1381 1328 -53
+ Misses 328 298 -30
+ Partials 93 86 -7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
proto/liftedinit/manifest/v1/query.proto (1)
7-7: Consider adding a comment to explain the empty Query service.The Query service is currently defined without any methods. To improve code clarity and maintainability, consider adding a comment explaining why the service is empty or if it's intended to be populated in the future.
Here's a suggested change:
// Query provides defines the gRPC querier service. +// TODO: Add methods to the Query service or remove if no longer needed. service Query {}x/manifest/types/genesis.go (1)
Line range hint
1-9: Overall simplification of GenesisState handling requires careful considerationThe changes in this file significantly simplify the
GenesisStatecreation and validation processes by removing default value initialization and validation logic. While this aligns with the PR objective of introducing amino support to the manifest and removing theParamsstructure, it's crucial to ensure that these changes don't introduce unintended consequences.Consider the following architectural implications:
- Ensure that all parts of the system that interact with
GenesisStateare updated to handle an empty state correctly.- Review the overall error handling and state validation strategy in the manifest module, as removing validation here might require additional checks elsewhere.
- Update any documentation or specifications related to the manifest module's genesis state to reflect these changes.
- Consider adding unit tests to verify that the system behaves correctly with the new empty
GenesisState.These changes represent a significant shift in how the manifest module handles its initial state and validation. Please ensure that all stakeholders are aware of these changes and their potential impact on the system's behavior and robustness.
x/manifest/types/codec.go (1)
Line range hint
1-25: Summary: Codec registrations updated to reflect new message types.The changes in this file consistently update both the legacy Amino codec and interface registrations to include
MsgPayoutandMsgBurnHeldBalance, while removingMsgUpdateParams. This aligns with the broader refactoring effort mentioned in the PR description.Key points:
- New message types (
MsgPayoutandMsgBurnHeldBalance) are properly registered.MsgUpdateParamshas been removed from all registrations.These changes may have broader implications for the codebase, particularly where
MsgUpdateParamswas previously used. Ensure that all affected areas have been updated accordingly and that the new message types are implemented and used correctly throughout the module.Consider adding a comment in this file or updating the module's documentation to explain the rationale behind these changes, especially the removal of
MsgUpdateParamsand the introduction of the new message types. This will help future maintainers understand the context of these modifications.scripts/protocgen.sh (1)
10-14: LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the regex change.The changes to the regex pattern and the
buf generatecommand look good. The updated regex now correctly targets the new package path, and the addition of quotes around$fileimproves the script's robustness when handling filenames with spaces.Consider adding a brief comment explaining why the package path was changed from
github.com/strangelove-ventures/poa/...togithub.com/liftedinit/manifest-ledger/.... This would help future maintainers understand the context of this change.for file in $(find "${dir}" -maxdepth 1 -name '*.proto'); do + # Note: Package path updated from strangelove-ventures/poa to liftedinit/manifest-ledger # this regex checks if a proto file has its go_package set to github.com/liftedinit/manifest-ledger/... # gogo proto files SHOULD ONLY be generated if this is false # we don't want gogo proto to run for proto files which are natively built for google.golang.org/protobuf if grep -q "option go_package" "$file" && grep -H -o -c 'option go_package.*github.com/liftedinit/manifest-ledger/api' "$file" | grep -q ':0$'; then buf generate --template buf.gen.gogo.yaml "$file" fi doneproto/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx.proto (2)
39-46: LGTM: Amino encoding and field options added correctlyThe changes to the
PayoutPairmessage are well-implemented:
- The Amino encoding option is added correctly.
- The additional options for the
coinfield enhance its encoding and type casting.- The blank line improves readability.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
PayoutPairmessage, similar to the comments forMsgPayoutandMsgBurnHeldBalance. This would improve the overall documentation of the proto file.
50-52: LGTM: MsgPayoutResponse added correctlyThe addition of the
MsgPayoutResponsemessage is necessary to complete thePayoutRPC method definition. The empty message is acceptable if no specific response data is needed.Consider adding a brief comment explaining why the response message is empty, e.g., "// MsgPayoutResponse is empty as the payout operation doesn't return any specific data." This would clarify the intentional design choice.
x/manifest/types/msgs.go (2)
4-4: Remove unused importThe
fmtpackage is imported but not used in the file. Consider removing this import to keep the code clean and avoid potential linting issues.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
- "fmt"
Line range hint
52-86: Consider using a map for duplicate address checkThe current implementation of the
Validatemethod uses a slice to check for duplicate addresses, which has a time complexity of O(n^2). For better performance, especially with a large number of payout pairs, consider using a map for duplicate checking.Here's a suggested implementation:
func (msg *MsgPayout) Validate() error { if _, err := sdk.AccAddressFromBech32(msg.Authority); err != nil { return errors.Wrap(err, "invalid authority address") } if len(msg.PayoutPairs) == 0 { return fmt.Errorf("payouts cannot be empty") } addressMap := make(map[string]struct{}) for _, p := range msg.PayoutPairs { addr := p.Address coin := p.Coin if _, err := sdk.AccAddressFromBech32(addr); err != nil { return errors.Wrapf(err, "invalid address %s", addr) } if coin.IsZero() { return fmt.Errorf("coin cannot be zero for address: %s", addr) } if err := coin.Validate(); err != nil { return errors.Wrapf(err, "invalid coin: %v for address: %s", coin, addr) } if _, exists := addressMap[addr]; exists { return fmt.Errorf("duplicate address: %s", addr) } addressMap[addr] = struct{}{} } return nil }This implementation uses a map for O(1) lookup time when checking for duplicates, improving the overall performance of the validation.
x/manifest/keeper/keeper.go (1)
93-100: Please clarify the motivations behind simplifying state management.The changes to
InitGenesisandExportGenesismethods suggest a significant shift in how this module manages state. Both methods have been simplified to essentially do nothing, which is a departure from typical module behavior in Cosmos SDK.Could you please provide some context on:
- The reasoning behind removing state management from this module?
- How this change affects the overall functionality of the manifest feature?
- Are there any potential impacts on other parts of the system that relied on this module's state?
This information would be valuable for understanding the broader implications of these changes and ensuring they align with the project's goals.
x/manifest/module.go (1)
Line range hint
1-180: Summary of changes in x/manifest/module.goThe changes in this file align with the removal of the
Paramsstructure and simplify the module's implementation. Key points:
DefaultGenesisnow returns an emptyGenesisState.ValidateGenesishas been streamlined and now usesdata.Validate().RegisterGRPCGatewayRouteshas been changed to an empty implementation, which requires clarification.InitGenesisnow delegates to the keeper's implementation.These changes generally improve the code structure, but please ensure that all verifications suggested in the individual comments are performed to maintain the module's functionality.
MODULE.md (3)
5-34: Improve TOC indentation and praise restructuringThe restructured Table of Contents provides a more concise and organized overview of the modules and their functionalities, which is a significant improvement. However, there are some indentation inconsistencies that should be addressed to enhance readability.
Please adjust the indentation of the list items in the Table of Contents to ensure consistency. Here's the correct indentation structure:
<!-- TOC --> * [Manifest Module](#manifest-module) * [Module Functionality](#module-functionality) * [Commands](#commands) * [Mint and disburse native tokens (payout)](#mint-and-disburse-native-tokens-payout) * [Burn native tokens (burn-coins)](#burn-native-tokens-burn-coins) * [Proof of Authority Module](#proof-of-authority-module) * [Module Functionality](#module-functionality-1) * [Validator Management](#validator-management) * [Administrative Rights](#administrative-rights) * [Commands](#commands-1) * [Update Staking Parameters (update-staking-params)](#update-staking-parameters-update-staking-params) * [Set Voting Power (set-power)](#set-voting-power-set-power) * [Remove Pending Validator (remove-pending)](#remove-pending-validator-remove-pending) * [Remove Validator (remove)](#remove-validator-remove) * [Token Factory Module](#token-factory-module) * [Module Functionality](#module-functionality-2) * [Token Minting](#token-minting) * [Token Burning](#token-burning) * [Token Administration](#token-administration) * [Metadata Management](#metadata-management) * [Commands](#commands-2) * [Burn (burn)](#burn-burn) * [Burn From (burn-from)](#burn-from-burn-from) * [Mint (mint)](#mint-mint) * [Change Admin (change-admin)](#change-admin-change-admin) * [Create Denom (create-denom)](#create-denom-create-denom) * [Force Transfer (force-transfer)](#force-transfer-force-transfer) * [Modify Metadata (modify-metadata)](#modify-metadata-modify-metadata) <!-- TOC -->This adjustment will resolve the indentation issues flagged by the static analysis tool and improve the overall readability of the Table of Contents.
🧰 Tools
LanguageTool
[duplication] ~6-~6: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...of Contents * Manifest Module * Module Functionality ...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~11-~11: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ens-burn-coins) * Proof of Authority Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~20-~20: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ve-validator-remove) * Token Factory Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
Markdownlint
6-6: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
7-7: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
8-8: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
9-9: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
10-10: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
11-11: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
12-12: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
13-13: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
14-14: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
15-15: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
16-16: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
17-17: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
18-18: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
19-19: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
20-20: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
21-21: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
22-22: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
23-23: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
24-24: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
25-25: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
26-26: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
28-28: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
29-29: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
30-30: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
31-31: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
32-32: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
33-33: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
Line range hint
62-132: PoA Module section is comprehensive and well-organizedThe Proof of Authority Module section provides a thorough overview of its functionality, including detailed descriptions of validator management and administrative rights. The command descriptions are comprehensive and include helpful examples.
Consider adding a brief note at the beginning of the PoA Module section to explain what PoA is and its significance in the context of this blockchain. This would provide valuable context for users who may be unfamiliar with the concept.
🧰 Tools
LanguageTool
[duplication] ~6-~6: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...of Contents * Manifest Module * Module Functionality ...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~11-~11: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ens-burn-coins) * Proof of Authority Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~20-~20: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ve-validator-remove) * Token Factory Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
Markdownlint
6-6: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
7-7: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
8-8: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
9-9: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
10-10: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
11-11: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
12-12: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
13-13: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
14-14: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
15-15: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
16-16: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
17-17: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
18-18: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
19-19: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
20-20: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
21-21: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
22-22: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
23-23: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
24-24: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
25-25: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
26-26: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
28-28: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
29-29: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
30-30: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
31-31: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
32-32: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
33-33: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
Line range hint
134-231: Token Factory Module section is detailed and well-structuredThe Token Factory Module section provides a comprehensive overview of its functionality, including clear descriptions of token minting, burning, administration, and metadata management. The command descriptions are well-formatted and include helpful examples.
There's a minor typo in the "Create Denom" command description. Please correct it as follows:
- > _note:_ the createor of the denom is the denoms admin. + > _note:_ the creator of the denom is the denom's admin.This correction will improve the readability and professionalism of the documentation.
🧰 Tools
LanguageTool
[duplication] ~6-~6: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...of Contents * Manifest Module * Module Functionality ...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~11-~11: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ens-burn-coins) * Proof of Authority Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~20-~20: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ve-validator-remove) * Token Factory Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
Markdownlint
6-6: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
7-7: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
8-8: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
9-9: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
10-10: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
11-11: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
12-12: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
13-13: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
14-14: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
15-15: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
16-16: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
17-17: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
18-18: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
19-19: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
20-20: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
21-21: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
22-22: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
23-23: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
24-24: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
25-25: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
26-26: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
28-28: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
29-29: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
30-30: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
31-31: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
32-32: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
33-33: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
Makefile (1)
173-173: Approved: Test output now visible, consider parameterizing verbosity.The removal of
/dev/nullredirection allows test output to be displayed, which is beneficial for debugging and understanding test results. However, this might lead to verbose output in CI/CD pipelines or frequent test runs.Consider parameterizing the verbosity of the test output. This would allow flexibility in different scenarios. For example:
VERBOSE ?= false ifeq ($(VERBOSE),true) TEST_OUTPUT := else TEST_OUTPUT := > /dev/null 2>&1 endif coverage: ... @go test ... $(TEST_OUTPUT)This way, you can control verbosity with
make coverage VERBOSE=trueormake coverage VERBOSE=false.interchaintest/poa_group_test.go (2)
Line range hint
63-71: LGTM: Comprehensive set of test proposals retained.The code maintains a diverse set of proposal variables covering various blockchain operations, which is excellent for thorough testing of the group-based governance system. The removal of manifest-related proposals is consistent with earlier changes.
Consider grouping related proposals (e.g., all token factory operations) together for improved readability. For example:
manifestBurnProposal = createManifestBurnProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewInt64Coin(Denom, 50))) bankSendProposal = createBankSendProposal(groupAddr, accAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(Denom, 1)) +tfCreateProposal = createTfCreateDenomProposal(groupAddr, tfDenom) +tfMintProposal = createTfMintProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 1234), "") +tfMintToProposal = createTfMintProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 4321), accAddr) +tfBurnProposal = createTfBurnProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 1234), "") +tfBurnFromProposal = createTfBurnProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 4321), accAddr) +tfForceTransferProposal = createTfForceTransferProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 1), accAddr, acc2Addr) +tfChangeAdminProposal = createTfChangeAdminProposal(groupAddr, tfFullDenom, accAddr) +tfModifyProposal = createTfModifyMetadataProposal(groupAddr, tfFullDenom, tfFullDenom, tfTicker, tfFullDenom, tfTicker, "The foo token description") -tfCreateProposal = createTfCreateDenomProposal(groupAddr, tfDenom) -tfMintProposal = createTfMintProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 1234), "") -tfMintToProposal = createTfMintProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 4321), accAddr) -tfBurnProposal = createTfBurnProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 1234), "") -tfBurnFromProposal = createTfBurnProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 4321), accAddr) -tfForceTransferProposal = createTfForceTransferProposal(groupAddr, sdk.NewInt64Coin(tfFullDenom, 1), accAddr, acc2Addr) -tfChangeAdminProposal = createTfChangeAdminProposal(groupAddr, tfFullDenom, accAddr) -tfModifyProposal = createTfModifyMetadataProposal(groupAddr, tfFullDenom, tfFullDenom, tfTicker, tfFullDenom, tfTicker, "The foo token description")
Line range hint
1-1000: Overall LGTM: Comprehensive test suite maintained with focused changes.The changes in this file consistently remove manifest-related proposals while maintaining a robust set of test scenarios for various blockchain operations. The structure and content of the file remain well-organized, ensuring thorough testing of the group-based governance system.
Consider adding a brief comment at the beginning of the file explaining the purpose of these tests and the recent changes (removal of manifest-related proposals). This would help future developers quickly understand the context of the test suite. For example:
// This file contains test scenarios for the Proof of Authority (PoA) group implementation. // It covers various blockchain operations including software upgrades, stakeholder payouts, // bank transactions, and token management. Recent changes have removed manifest-related // proposals to focus on core governance functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (6)
api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/query_grpc.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.goapi/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx_grpc.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/manifest/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/manifest/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/manifest/types/query.pb.gw.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.gox/manifest/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
- MODULE.md (1 hunks)
- Makefile (2 hunks)
- api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/genesis.pulsar.go (4 hunks)
- api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/query.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
- api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx.pulsar.go (24 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (0 hunks)
- go.mod (2 hunks)
- interchaintest/helpers/manifest.go (0 hunks)
- interchaintest/mainfest_test.go (0 hunks)
- interchaintest/poa_group_test.go (1 hunks)
- proto/liftedinit/manifest/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/liftedinit/manifest/v1/query.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- scripts/protocgen.sh (1 hunks)
- x/manifest/client/cli/query.go (0 hunks)
- x/manifest/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/manifest/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/manifest/keeper/msg_server.go (0 hunks)
- x/manifest/keeper/msg_server_test.go (0 hunks)
- x/manifest/keeper/quierier.go (0 hunks)
- x/manifest/module.go (3 hunks)
- x/manifest/simulation/operations.go (0 hunks)
- x/manifest/types/codec.go (1 hunks)
- x/manifest/types/codec_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/manifest/types/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/manifest/types/msgs.go (1 hunks)
- x/manifest/types/msgs_test.go (0 hunks)
- x/manifest/types/params.go (0 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (10)
- app/test_helpers.go
- interchaintest/helpers/manifest.go
- interchaintest/mainfest_test.go
- x/manifest/client/cli/query.go
- x/manifest/keeper/msg_server.go
- x/manifest/keeper/msg_server_test.go
- x/manifest/keeper/quierier.go
- x/manifest/simulation/operations.go
- x/manifest/types/msgs_test.go
- x/manifest/types/params.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/query.pulsar.go
🧰 Additional context used
LanguageTool
MODULE.md
[duplication] ~6-~6: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...of Contents * Manifest Module * Module Functionality ...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~11-~11: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ens-burn-coins) * Proof of Authority Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~20-~20: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ve-validator-remove) * Token Factory Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
Markdownlint
MODULE.md
6-6: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
7-7: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
8-8: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
9-9: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
10-10: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
11-11: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
12-12: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
13-13: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
14-14: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
15-15: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
16-16: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
17-17: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
18-18: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
19-19: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
20-20: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
21-21: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
22-22: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
23-23: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
24-24: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
25-25: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
26-26: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
28-28: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
29-29: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
30-30: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
31-31: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
32-32: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
33-33: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (37)
proto/liftedinit/manifest/v1/query.proto (2)
1-5: LGTM: Package and option declarations are correct.The syntax, package, and go_package option declarations are appropriate and unchanged.
🧰 Tools
buf
2-2: Files with package "liftedinit.manifest.v1" must be within a directory "liftedinit/manifest/v1" relative to root but were in directory "proto/liftedinit/manifest/v1".
(PACKAGE_DIRECTORY_MATCH)
Line range hint
6-8: Verify the intentional removal of all Query service methods.The Query service has been emptied of all methods, including the previously existing Params-related functionality. This is a significant change that may impact other parts of the system.
Please confirm if this removal was intentional and that the functionality has been appropriately relocated or is no longer needed.
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any remaining references to the removed functionality in other proto files, which may need to be updated.
🧰 Tools
buf
2-2: Files with package "liftedinit.manifest.v1" must be within a directory "liftedinit/manifest/v1" relative to root but were in directory "proto/liftedinit/manifest/v1".
(PACKAGE_DIRECTORY_MATCH)
proto/liftedinit/manifest/v1/genesis.proto (1)
7-7: LGTM: GenesisState simplificationThe simplification of the
GenesisStatemessage to an empty structure is syntactically correct. This change suggests that the module no longer requires any initial state parameters.However, we should verify the impact of this change on the module's initialization and functionality. Please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old
GenesisStatestructure:x/manifest/types/genesis.go (2)
8-9:⚠️ Potential issueRestore validation logic or update method name and comment
The current implementation of the
Validatemethod no longer performs any validation, which contradicts its name and comment. This change could have significant implications:
- Invalid states might be created or used in the system, potentially leading to unexpected behavior or errors.
- The overall robustness and reliability of the system could be compromised without proper validation.
Consider the following actions:
- If validation is still necessary, restore the validation logic to ensure the
GenesisStateis always in a valid state.- If validation is truly no longer needed, update the method name and comment to reflect its new behavior:
// NoOpValidate is a placeholder method that performs no validation. func (gs *GenesisState) NoOpValidate() error { return nil }- Review all code that relies on this validation to ensure it can handle potentially invalid states.
To assess the impact of this change, please run the following script to find all usages of the
Validatemethod:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of the Validate method on GenesisState echo "Searching for GenesisState.Validate() usages:" rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'GenesisState.*\.Validate\(\)'
3-6:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate function comment and consider implications of removing default values
The current implementation of
NewGenesisStateno longer aligns with its comment. The function now returns an emptyGenesisStatewithout any default values, which contradicts the comment stating it "creates a new genesis state with default values."This change might have the following implications:
- Parts of the system expecting initialized fields in the
GenesisStatemay encounter issues.- The removal of default values could lead to unexpected behavior if not properly handled elsewhere in the codebase.
Consider the following actions:
- Update the function comment to accurately reflect its current behavior:
// NewGenesisState creates a new empty genesis state.- If default values are still necessary, consider restoring the initialization logic.
- Verify that all consumers of
NewGenesisStatecan handle an emptyGenesisStatecorrectly.To ensure this change doesn't introduce issues, please run the following script to check for usages of
NewGenesisState:x/manifest/types/codec_test.go (1)
21-25: LGTM. Please verify the removal ofMsgUpdateParams.The changes to the test function are consistent with the removal of the
Paramsstructure and related logic, as mentioned in the PR summary. The reduction in the number of expected implementations from 3 to 2 and the removal ofMsgUpdateParamsfrom theElementsMatchcheck appear to be correct.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to verify that
MsgUpdateParamshas been removed from all relevant files:Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for removing
MsgUpdateParamsto provide context for future developers:func TestCodecRegisterInterfaces(t *testing.T) { registry := codectypes.NewInterfaceRegistry() registry.RegisterInterface(sdk.MsgInterfaceProtoName, (*sdk.Msg)(nil)) RegisterInterfaces(registry) impls := registry.ListImplementations(sdk.MsgInterfaceProtoName) + // Note: MsgUpdateParams has been removed as part of the Params structure removal require.Len(t, impls, 2) require.ElementsMatch(t, []string{ prefix + "MsgPayout", prefix + "MsgBurnHeldBalance", }, impls) }x/manifest/types/codec.go (3)
5-5: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate.The addition of the
"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/codec/legacy"import is consistent with the changes made in theRegisterLegacyAminoCodecfunction and is necessary for using thelegacy.RegisterAminoMsgfunction.
21-21: LGTM: Interface registrations updated correctly.The addition of
MsgPayoutandMsgBurnHeldBalanceto the list of registered implementations is correct and consistent with the changes made in theRegisterLegacyAminoCodecfunction.To ensure that all necessary message types are registered, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any Msg types that might need to be registered # Test: Search for struct definitions that start with "Msg". Expect: All found types to be registered in RegisterInterfaces ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type Msg$_ struct { $$$ }'Compare the results with the registrations in this function to ensure completeness.
13-14: LGTM: New message types registered correctly.The addition of
MsgPayoutandMsgBurnHeldBalanceregistrations is implemented correctly. However, please note that the removal ofMsgUpdateParamsmight affect other parts of the codebase that were using this message type.To ensure that the removal of
MsgUpdateParamsdoesn't cause issues, please run the following script:proto/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx.proto (4)
27-27: LGTM: Amino encoding option added correctlyThe addition of the Amino encoding option for
MsgPayoutis consistent with the PR objective of adding Amino support to the manifest. The naming convention used ("lifted/manifest/MsgPayout") follows a standard format.
58-58: LGTM: Amino encoding option added correctlyThe addition of the Amino encoding option for
MsgBurnHeldBalanceis consistent with the PR objective of adding Amino support to the manifest. The naming convention used ("lifted/manifest/MsgBurnHeldBalance") follows the same standard format asMsgPayout.
65-67: LGTM: Field options added correctlyThe additional options for the
burn_coinsfield inMsgBurnHeldBalanceare well-implemented:
- They enhance the field's encoding and type casting.
- The changes are consistent with the options added to the
coinfield inPayoutPair.These modifications improve the overall consistency and functionality of the proto file.
Line range hint
1-74: Overall implementation looks good, with a suggestion for verificationThe changes to add Amino support to the manifest have been implemented correctly. The additions of Amino encoding options and field options enhance the functionality and consistency of the proto file.
To ensure the removal of
MsgUpdateParamsdoesn't have unintended consequences, please run the following verification script:This script will help ensure that the removal of
MsgUpdateParamsis complete and consistent across the codebase.x/manifest/types/msgs.go (2)
Line range hint
88-124: LGTM: MsgBurnHeldBalance implementationThe implementation of
MsgBurnHeldBalanceand its associated methods (NewMsgBurnHeldBalance, Route, Type, GetSigners, and Validate) looks correct and follows the expected patterns for Cosmos SDK message types. The validation logic is appropriate and checks for essential conditions.
Line range hint
1-124: Summary of changes and their impactThe removal of
MsgUpdateParamsand its associated methods aligns with the PR objectives of introducing amino support to the manifest. This change simplifies the module structure and removes functionality related to updating parameters.The remaining message types (
MsgPayoutandMsgBurnHeldBalance) are implemented correctly and follow the expected patterns for Cosmos SDK message types. These changes contribute to a more streamlined and focused manifest module.To further improve the code:
- Remove the unused
fmtimport.- Consider optimizing the duplicate address check in
MsgPayout.Validatemethod using a map for better performance.Overall, these changes enhance the maintainability and clarity of the manifest module.
x/manifest/keeper/keeper.go (2)
93-95: Verify the empty implementation ofInitGenesis.The
InitGenesismethod is currently empty and returnsnil. While this might be intentional if no initialization is required for the genesis state, it's unusual to have a completely empty implementation for this method.Please confirm if this is intentional. If so, consider adding a comment explaining why no initialization is needed:
func (k *Keeper) InitGenesis(_ context.Context, _ *types.GenesisState) error { + // No initialization required for the genesis state return nil }To verify that this empty implementation is correct, let's check if there are any fields in the
GenesisStatethat might need initialization:✅ Verification successful
Empty implementation of
InitGenesisverified.The
GenesisStatestruct is empty inx/manifest/types/genesis.pb.go, confirming that no initialization is required. However, it's good practice to add a comment explaining the empty implementation:func (k *Keeper) InitGenesis(_ context.Context, _ *types.GenesisState) error { + // No initialization required for the genesis state return nil }🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition of GenesisState ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type GenesisState struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 550
97-100: Verify the simplified implementation ofExportGenesis.The
ExportGenesismethod has been simplified to always return an emptyGenesisState. This aligns with the emptyInitGenesismethod, suggesting that the module no longer manages any persistent state.Please confirm if this simplification is intentional and part of a larger refactoring to remove state management from this module. If so, consider adding a comment explaining the change:
// ExportGenesis exports the module's state to a genesis state. func (k *Keeper) ExportGenesis(_ context.Context) *types.GenesisState { + // Return an empty GenesisState as this module no longer manages persistent state return &types.GenesisState{} }To verify that this simplification is correct and consistent with other parts of the codebase, let's check for any remaining uses of
GenesisStatefields:✅ Verification successful
Simplified
ExportGenesisimplementation verified.
TheExportGenesismethod correctly returns an emptyGenesisState, aligning with the module no longer managing persistent state.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of GenesisState fields rg --type go 'GenesisState\.' -A 5Length of output: 1583
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any declarations or usages of GenesisState type rg --type go '\bGenesisState\b' --context 5Length of output: 34012
x/manifest/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-131: Verify the consistency ofParamsremoval across the codebase.The simplification of the
TestExportGenesisfunction, particularly the removal ofParams-related checks, appears to be an isolated change in this file. To ensure consistency and prevent potential issues, it's important to verify that this change has been applied uniformly across the entire codebase.Run the following script to check for any remaining references to
Paramsin the manifest module:This script will help identify any remaining references to
Paramsin the manifest module that might need to be addressed for consistency.x/manifest/module.go (4)
88-88: Verify the removal of GRPC gateway routes registration.The
RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutesmethod has been changed to an empty implementation. This could potentially lead to missing functionality if GRPC gateway routes are still required.Please clarify if GRPC gateway routes are no longer needed or if they are being handled differently elsewhere. Run the following script to check for any other GRPC gateway route registrations in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for GRPC gateway route registrations rg --type go "RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes.*runtime.ServeMux" -g '!x/manifest/module.go'
126-128: Improved InitGenesis implementation.The change to use
am.keeper.InitGenesiscentralizes the initialization logic in the keeper, which is a good practice for separation of concerns. The added error handling is also an improvement.Please ensure that the keeper's
InitGenesismethod properly initializes all necessary state. Run the following script to inspect the keeper'sInitGenesismethod:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the keeper's InitGenesis method implementation ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (k Keeper) InitGenesis(ctx sdk.Context, data *types.GenesisState) error { $$$ }'
79-82: Streamlined ValidateGenesis implementation.The updated method simplifies error handling and uses
data.Validate()for validation, which is a good practice. This change aligns with the removal of theParamsstructure.Please ensure that the
Validatemethod in theGenesisStatestruct thoroughly checks all necessary fields. Run the following script to inspect theValidatemethod:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the Validate method implementation ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type GenesisState struct { $$$ } func (g GenesisState) Validate() error { $$$ }'
74-74: Simplified DefaultGenesis implementation.The change to return an empty
GenesisStatealigns with the removal of theParamsstructure. This simplification is good for maintainability.Please verify that this change doesn't negatively impact the module's initialization process. Run the following script to check for any references to default genesis state in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Error detected in the previous shell script.
Please run the following corrected script to check for references to
DefaultGenesisin the codebase:
No References Found for
DefaultGenesisOutside ofx/manifest/module.goAll references to
DefaultGenesisare confined tox/manifest/module.go. The change to return an emptyGenesisStatehas been verified and does not impact other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to default genesis state rg --type go "DefaultGenesis.*manifest" -g '!x/manifest/module.go'Length of output: 248
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to default genesis state rg --type go 'DefaultGenesis.*manifest' -g '!x/manifest/module.go'Length of output: 68
MODULE.md (2)
Line range hint
36-60: Manifest Module section is well-structured and informativeThe Manifest Module section provides a clear and concise overview of its functionality, including manual minting and coin burning events. The command descriptions are well-formatted, easy to understand, and include helpful examples.
🧰 Tools
LanguageTool
[duplication] ~6-~6: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...of Contents * Manifest Module * Module Functionality ...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~11-~11: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ens-burn-coins) * Proof of Authority Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~20-~20: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ve-validator-remove) * Token Factory Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
Markdownlint
6-6: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
7-7: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
8-8: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
9-9: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
10-10: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
11-11: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
12-12: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
13-13: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
14-14: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
15-15: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
16-16: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
17-17: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
18-18: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
19-19: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
20-20: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
21-21: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
22-22: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
23-23: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
24-24: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
25-25: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
26-26: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
28-28: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
29-29: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
30-30: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
31-31: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
32-32: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
33-33: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
Line range hint
1-231: Overall improvements enhance document clarity and usabilityThe changes made to the MODULE.md file have significantly improved its structure, readability, and usefulness. The restructured Table of Contents provides a clear overview of the document's contents, while the detailed module descriptions offer comprehensive information on each module's functionality and commands.
Key improvements include:
- A more concise and organized Table of Contents
- Detailed descriptions of the Manifest, Proof of Authority, and Token Factory modules
- Clear and well-formatted command descriptions with helpful examples
The minor issues with indentation and the typo mentioned in previous comments are easily addressable and do not detract from the overall quality of the document.
These updates will greatly benefit users by providing them with a more accessible and informative guide to the various modules and their functionalities.
🧰 Tools
LanguageTool
[duplication] ~6-~6: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...of Contents * Manifest Module * Module Functionality ...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~11-~11: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ens-burn-coins) * Proof of Authority Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~20-~20: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ve-validator-remove) * Token Factory Module * Module Functionality...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
Markdownlint
6-6: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
7-7: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
8-8: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
9-9: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
10-10: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
11-11: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
12-12: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
13-13: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
14-14: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
15-15: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
16-16: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
17-17: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
18-18: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
19-19: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
20-20: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
21-21: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
22-22: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
23-23: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
24-24: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
25-25: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
26-26: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
28-28: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
29-29: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
30-30: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
31-31: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
32-32: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
33-33: Expected: 6; Actual: 8
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
Makefile (1)
198-198:⚠️ Potential issueSecurity concern: Docker container running as root user.
The addition of
--user rootto the Docker run command grants the container root privileges. While this might be necessary for certain operations, it poses potential security risks.Could you please provide more context on why root privileges are required? If possible, consider the following alternatives:
- Use a non-root user with specific permissions granted.
- If root is absolutely necessary, consider using the
--userflag with a specific UID:GID instead ofroot.- Implement the principle of least privilege by granting only the necessary permissions.
To verify the impact and necessity of this change, please run the following script:
This will help identify specific operations that might require elevated privileges.
go.mod (3)
Line range hint
1-224: Summary: Dependency cleanup with no version changes.The changes in this file represent a cleanup of direct dependencies, moving two packages to indirect dependencies. This is a good practice that can help simplify the project's dependency management. No new dependencies or version updates were introduced, which minimizes the risk of compatibility issues.
These changes suggest that the codebase has been refactored to remove direct imports of these packages. To ensure the changes are complete and consistent:
- Verify that all direct imports of the moved packages have been removed from the codebase.
- Run tests to ensure that the functionality dependent on these packages still works as expected.
- Update any documentation or build scripts that might reference these direct dependencies.
214-214: LGTM: Dependency moved to indirect.The
google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api v0.0.0-20240528184218-531527333157dependency has been moved from direct to indirect. This change is appropriate if the project no longer directly imports this package.Please verify that all direct imports of
google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apihave been removed from the codebase. You can use the following command to check for any remaining imports:#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining imports of google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api rg --type go 'import.*"google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api'
120-120: LGTM: Dependency moved to indirect.The
github.com/golang/protobuf v1.5.4dependency has been moved from direct to indirect. This change is appropriate if the project no longer directly imports this package.Please verify that all direct imports of
github.com/golang/protobufhave been removed from the codebase. You can use the following command to check for any remaining imports:✅ Verification successful
A verification script was not executed correctly. Please run the appropriate command to check for any remaining imports of
github.com/golang/protobuf:
Verified: No direct imports of
github.com/golang/protobuffound.The
github.com/golang/protobuf v1.5.4dependency has been successfully moved to indirect with no remaining direct imports in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining imports of github.com/golang/protobuf rg --type go 'import.*"github.com/golang/protobuf'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining imports of github.com/golang/protobuf rg --type go 'import.*"github.com/golang/protobuf'Length of output: 52
interchaintest/poa_group_test.go (2)
60-61: LGTM: Upgrade proposal variables retained.The
upgradeProposalandcancelUpgradeProposalvariables have been retained while removing manifest-related proposals. This change aligns with the focus on upgrade functionality in the test scenarios.
Line range hint
72-72: LGTM: Proposal ID initialization.The
proposalIdvariable is correctly initialized to 1, which is a common practice for starting proposal IDs. This will be useful for tracking and managing proposals throughout the test scenarios.api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx.pulsar.go (5)
Line range hint
1-2764: Summary of changes in tx.pulsar.goThe changes in this file are consistent with the removal of
MsgUpdateParamsandMsgUpdateParamsResponsemessage types. The main impacts are:
- Message type indices have been updated for remaining types.
- The total number of message types has been reduced from 7 to 5.
These changes simplify the protocol but may require updates in code that interacts with these messages or relies on specific message type indices. Please ensure that all references to the removed message types and indices have been properly handled throughout the codebase.
600-600: Note the change in message type index for PayoutPair.The message type index for
PayoutPairhas changed from 3 to 1. This change is consistent with the removal of other message types as mentioned in the summary. While this doesn't affect the functionality of the message itself, it may impact any code that relies on these specific indices.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any hardcoded references to message type indices rg -t go '(?i)msgTypes\[[0-9]\]' --glob '!api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx.pulsar.go'
1095-1095: Note the change in message type index for MsgPayoutResponse.The message type index for
MsgPayoutResponsehas changed from 4 to 2. This change is consistent with the removal of other message types as mentioned in the summary. While this doesn't affect the functionality of the message itself, it may impact any code that relies on these specific indices.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any hardcoded references to message type indices rg -t go '(?i)msgTypes\[[0-9]\]' --glob '!api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx.pulsar.go'
2655-2676: Verify the impact of removed message types.The number of message types has been reduced from 7 to 5, which is consistent with the removal of
MsgUpdateParamsandMsgUpdateParamsResponse. This change simplifies the protocol but may require updates in code that interacts with these messages. Please ensure that all references to the removed message types have been properly handled throughout the codebase.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to the removed message types rg -t go '(?i)(MsgUpdateParams|MsgUpdateParamsResponse)'
93-93: Note the change in message type index for MsgPayout.The message type index for
MsgPayouthas changed from 2 to 0. This change is consistent with the removal of other message types as mentioned in the summary. While this doesn't affect the functionality of the message itself, it may impact any code that relies on these specific indices.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
The previous script encountered a syntax error. Here's the corrected version to search for hardcoded references to message type indices:
Hardcoded message type indices do not exist in
tx.pulsar.go. The change in the message type index forMsgPayoutis safe and does not affect other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any hardcoded references to message type indices rg -t go '(?i)msgTypes\[[0-9]\]' --glob '!api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx.pulsar.go'Length of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any hardcoded references to message type indices rg -t go '(?i)msgTypes\[[0-9]+\]' --glob '!api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/tx.pulsar.go'Length of output: 857
api/liftedinit/manifest/v1/genesis.pulsar.go (2)
449-449: Update of message types aligns with the removal ofParamsThe
file_liftedinit_manifest_v1_genesis_proto_msgTypesnow initializes with one message type, reflecting the removal of theParamsmessage type. This update is appropriate and keeps the codebase consistent.
486-486:NumMessagesupdated correctlyThe
NumMessagesfield in theTypeBuilderhas been updated to1, which accurately reflects the current number of messages after removingParams. This ensures that the protobuf type information remains consistent.
| genState := k.ExportGenesis(f.Ctx) | ||
|
|
||
| require.NotNil(t, genState.Params) | ||
| require.NotNil(t, genState) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding more specific assertions for the exported genesis state.
While checking if the genState is not nil is a good basic test, it might be beneficial to add more specific assertions to ensure the correctness of the exported genesis state. This could include checking for the presence and validity of expected fields within the genState.
Consider adding assertions like:
require.NotNil(t, genState)
// Add more specific checks, for example:
// require.NotEmpty(t, genState.SomeExpectedField)
// require.Equal(t, expectedValue, genState.AnotherField)Replace SomeExpectedField and AnotherField with actual fields from your GenesisState structure, and expectedValue with the appropriate expected value.
| @@ -15,14 +13,12 @@ import ( | |||
| ) | |||
|
|
|||
| var ( | |||
| md_GenesisState protoreflect.MessageDescriptor | |||
| fd_GenesisState_params protoreflect.FieldDescriptor | |||
| md_GenesisState protoreflect.MessageDescriptor | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Potential Backward Compatibility Issues Detected
The removal of the Params field from GenesisState may break existing implementations that rely on it.
app/test_helpers.go:authGenesis := authtypes.NewGenesisState(authtypes.DefaultParams(), genAccs)stakingGenesis := stakingtypes.NewGenesisState(stParams, validators, delegations)bankGenesis := banktypes.NewGenesisState(banktypes.DefaultGenesisState().Params, balances, totalSupply, []banktypes.Metadata{}, []banktypes.SendEnabled{})
🔗 Analysis chain
Removal of Params: Ensure backward compatibility
The removal of the Params structure and its associated methods simplifies the GenesisState. However, please verify that this change does not break backward compatibility with existing serialized data or other modules that may rely on the Params field.
You can run the following script to check for any references to Params in other parts of the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search the codebase for references to `Params` in the `manifestv1` package.
# Test: Find all references to `Params` in Go files within the `manifestv1` package.
rg --type go 'manifestv1.Params'
# Find any usage of `GenesisState` expecting a `Params` field.
rg --type go 'GenesisState.*Params'
Length of output: 447
| &MsgPayout{}, | ||
| &MsgBurnHeldBalance{}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Message was missing here
| - [Create Denom (create-denom)](#create-denom-create-denom) | ||
| - [Force Transfer (force-transfer)](#force-transfer-force-transfer) | ||
| - [Modify Metadata (modify-metadata)](#modify-metadata-modify-metadata) | ||
| <!-- TOC --> |
| // MsgPayout is the Msg/Payout request type. | ||
| message MsgPayout { | ||
| option (cosmos.msg.v1.signer) = "authority"; | ||
| option (gogoproto.equal) = false; | ||
| option (amino.name) = "lifted/manifest/MsgPayout"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added amino names on each message type.
[skip_ci]
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
UpdateParamsfunctionality, simplifying interactions with theGenesisState.MsgPayoutandMsgBurnHeldBalancewith unique names.Bug Fixes
Documentation
MODULE.mdfor improved clarity on module functionalities.Chores
Paramsstructures and related logic to simplify codebase and improve maintainability.