Support for the stm32 platform
#2185
Conversation
lhstrh
changed the title
stm32 platform
|
@erlingrj and @tanneberger: it seems to me that a better place to implement this would be in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks promising @naichenzhao!
On a higher level. I worry that we will just pile on code and complexity for each target we want to support. It would be a huge improvement if STM32/Pico/Zephyr/++ support could be captured in a single CMake file that is not code-generated but just embedded in the JAR. @petervdonovan discuss this a little her: #2154.
I think we can merge in the STM32 stuff. But after this we should think a little about how we can make this scale better.
|
|
||
| // Declaration preamble | ||
| code.pr("set(PROJECT_DIR ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR})"); | ||
| code.pr("set(STM_DIR ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../../STM_sdk)"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems to require that you have a directory called STM_sdk in some relative position wrt to src-gen directory? I think we want the user to download the STM SDK themselves and define an environment variable pointing to it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any update here? I think we should require an environmental variable pointing to where STM_sdk is located and the user can then put it anywhere
|
@naichenzhao, do you think you'll find an opportunity to work on this anytime soon? This efforts needs to be revived... |
Subsumes #2103.