-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 331
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge branch 'feat-clique-number' into feat-independence-set
- Loading branch information
Showing
1,179 changed files
with
25,835 additions
and
11,878 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ | ||
/- | ||
Copyright (c) 2024 Alex Brodbelt. All rights reserved. | ||
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. | ||
Authors: Alex Brodbelt, Violeta Hernández | ||
-/ | ||
|
||
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum | ||
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith | ||
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic | ||
|
||
/-! | ||
# IMO 1982 Q1 | ||
The function `f` is defined for all positive integers `n` and takes on | ||
non-negative integer values. Also, for all `m`, `n` | ||
`f (m + n) - f(m) - f(n) = 0` or `1` | ||
`f 2 = 0`, `f 3 > 0`, and `f 9999 = 3333`. | ||
Determine `f 1982`. | ||
The solution is based on the one at the | ||
[Art of Problem Solving](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/1982_IMO_Problems/Problem_1) | ||
website. | ||
We prove the helper lemmas: | ||
1. `f m + f n ≤ f(m + n)` `superadditive`. | ||
2. `n * f(m) ≤ f(m * n)` `superhomogeneous`. | ||
3. `a * f a + c * f d ≤ f (a * b + c * d)` `superlinear`, (derived from 1. and 2.). | ||
So we can establish on the one hand that `f 1980 ≤ 660`, | ||
by observing that `660 * 1 = 660 * f3 ≤ f 1980 = f (660 * 3)`. | ||
On the other hand, we establish that `f 1980 ≥ 660` | ||
from `5 * f 1980 + 33 * f 3 ≤ f (5 * 1980 + 33 * 1) = f 9999 = 3333`. | ||
We then conclude `f 1980 = 660` and then eventually determine that either | ||
`f 1982 = 660` or `f 1982 = 661`. | ||
In the latter case we derive a contradiction, because if `f 1982 = 661` then | ||
`3334 = 5 * f 1982 + 29 * f(3) + f(2) ≤ f (5 * 1982 + 29 * 3 + 2) = f 9999 = 3333`. | ||
-/ | ||
|
||
namespace Imo1982Q1 | ||
|
||
structure IsGood (f : ℕ+ → ℕ) : Prop where | ||
/-- The function satisfies the functional relation-/ | ||
rel: ∀ m n : ℕ+, f (m + n) = f m + f n ∨ f (m + n) = f m + f n + 1 | ||
f₂ : f 2 = 0 | ||
hf₃ : 0 < f 3 | ||
f_9999 : f 9999 = 3333 | ||
|
||
namespace IsGood | ||
|
||
variable {f : ℕ+ → ℕ} (hf : IsGood f) | ||
include hf | ||
|
||
lemma f₁ : f 1 = 0 := by | ||
have h : f 2 = 2 * f 1 ∨ f 2 = 2 * f 1 + 1 := by rw [two_mul]; exact hf.rel 1 1 | ||
obtain h₁ | h₂ := hf.f₂ ▸ h | ||
· rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_zero] at h₁ | ||
apply h₁.resolve_left | ||
norm_num | ||
· cases Nat.succ_ne_zero _ h₂.symm | ||
|
||
lemma f₃ : f 3 = 1 := by | ||
have h : f 3 = f 2 + f 1 ∨ f 3 = f 2 + f 1 + 1 := by apply hf.rel 2 1 | ||
rw [hf.f₁, hf.f₂, add_zero, zero_add] at h | ||
have not_left : ¬ f 3 = 0 := by apply ne_of_gt hf.hf₃ | ||
rw [or_iff_right (not_left)] at h | ||
exact h | ||
|
||
lemma superadditive {m n : ℕ+} : f m + f n ≤ f (m + n) := by | ||
have h := hf.rel m n | ||
rcases h with ( hl | hr ) | ||
· rw [hl] | ||
· rw [hr]; nth_rewrite 1 [← add_zero (f n), ← add_assoc]; apply add_le_add_right (by norm_num) | ||
|
||
lemma superhomogeneous {m n : ℕ+} : ↑n * f m ≤ f (n * m) := by | ||
induction n using PNat.recOn | ||
case p1 => simp | ||
case hp n' ih => | ||
calc | ||
↑(n' + 1) * f m = ↑n' * f m + f m := by rw [PNat.add_coe, add_mul, PNat.val_ofNat, one_mul] | ||
_ ≤ f (n' * m) + f m := add_le_add_right ih (f m) | ||
_ ≤ f (n' * m + m) := hf.superadditive | ||
_ = f ((n' + 1) * m) := by congr; rw [add_mul, one_mul] | ||
|
||
lemma superlinear {a b c d : ℕ+} : a * f b + c * f d ≤ f (a * b + c * d) := | ||
(add_le_add hf.superhomogeneous hf.superhomogeneous).trans hf.superadditive | ||
|
||
lemma le_mul_three_apply (n : ℕ+) : n ≤ f (3 * n) := by | ||
rw [← mul_one (n : ℕ), ← hf.f₃, mul_comm 3] | ||
exact hf.superhomogeneous | ||
|
||
lemma part_1 : 660 ≤ f (1980) := by | ||
exact hf.le_mul_three_apply 660 | ||
|
||
lemma part_2 : f 1980 ≤ 660 := by | ||
have h : 5 * f 1980 + 33 * f 3 ≤ 5 * 660 + 33 := by | ||
calc (5 : ℕ+) * f 1980 + (33 : ℕ+) * f 3 ≤ f (5 * 1980 + 33 * 3) := by apply hf.superlinear | ||
_ = f 9999 := by rfl | ||
_ = 5 * 660 + 33 := by rw [hf.f_9999] | ||
rw [hf.f₃, mul_one] at h | ||
-- from 5 * f 1980 + 33 ≤ 5 * 660 + 33 we show f 1980 ≤ 660 | ||
linarith | ||
|
||
end IsGood | ||
|
||
end Imo1982Q1 | ||
|
||
open Imo1982Q1 | ||
|
||
lemma imo1982_q1 {f : ℕ+ → ℕ} (hf : IsGood f) : f 1982 = 660 := by | ||
have f_1980 := hf.part_2.antisymm hf.part_1 | ||
have h : f 1982 = f 1980 + f 2 ∨ f 1982 = f 1980 + f 2 + 1 := hf.rel 1980 2 | ||
rw [f_1980, hf.f₂, add_zero] at h | ||
apply h.resolve_right | ||
intro hr | ||
suffices h : 3334 ≤ 3333 by norm_num at h | ||
calc | ||
3334 = 5 * f 1982 + 29 * f 3 + f 2 := by rw [hf.f₃, hf.f₂, hr, add_zero, mul_one] | ||
(5 : ℕ+) * f 1982 + (29 : ℕ+) * f 3 + f 2 ≤ f (5 * 1982 + 29 * 3) + f 2 := | ||
add_le_add_right hf.superlinear _ | ||
_ ≤ f (5 * 1982 + 29 * 3 + 2) := hf.superadditive | ||
_ = 3333 := hf.f_9999 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.