[pt] Removed "temp_off" from rule ID:ESTAR_AQUI_PARA_INF_VIR_INF

[marcoagpinto]

Heya, @susanaboatto and @p-goulart ,

I have removed the "temp_off".

https://internal1.languagetool.org/regression-tests/via-http/2024-08-14/pt-BR/result_style_ESTAR_AQUI_PARA_INF_VIR_INF%5B1%5D.html

[susanaboatto]

Note that in pt-BR, vimos ajudar sounds unnatural and would likely not be accepted, the past form viemos ajudar being preferred. In fact, the conjugation of this verb in the third-person plural is avidly avoided in the present tense, often being replaced with the singular a gente or other alternatives (likely due to confusion with the verb ver). I think this entire rule would sound better in pt-BR if the verb "vir" was converted into its past perfect form when the original verb "estar" is in the simple present:

Eu estou aqui para ajudar → Vim ajudar.

Is this also the case for pt-PT? If not, I would suggest moving this rule to the pt-PT grammar.

Also, this example:

Nós sempre estamos aqui para ajudar.

does not seem to work well for any given pronoun — you might want to consider adding exceptions for sentences with adverbs like sempre, as they imply a change of meaning when this rule is applied.

[marcoagpinto]

Sure… I will do it tonight or at 5am and tomorrow when both you and Pedro arrive at work I will have the rule fixed, and I will readd the temp_off.

Thanks for the feedback.

[marcoagpinto]

@susanaboatto

I have just fixed the rule.

I changed the rule like you suggested, changing the verbal form it shows as output.

Here is the resulting file:

2.txt