Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use RequiresRepublish in secret rotation. #1622

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dargudear-google
Copy link
Contributor

Remove the rotation controller and rely exclusively on RequiresRepublish for secret rotation.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dargudear-google
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign tam7t for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @dargudear-google. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 7, 2024
@dargudear-google dargudear-google changed the title Use in secret rotation Use RequiresRepublish in secret rotation. Sep 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 7, 2024
@dargudear-google dargudear-google marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2024 13:30
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 10, 2024
Copy link

@amitmodak amitmodak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approach broadly LGTM! IIUC, once this PR is submitted, auto-rotation won't work for k8s clusters < 1.21. What is the process to announce and manage this breaking change?

@dargudear-google
Copy link
Contributor Author

Approach broadly LGTM! IIUC, once this PR is submitted, auto-rotation won't work for k8s clusters < 1.21. What is the process to announce and manage this breaking change?

Discussed in the last community call that we should publish that "For clusters < 1.21, please use v.1.4.5 or earlier."

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 32.14286% with 38 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 31.01%. Comparing base (87f51ec) to head (7f38830).
Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...rollers/secretproviderclasspodstatus_controller.go 13.79% 24 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/secrets-store/secrets-store.go 22.22% 7 Missing ⚠️
pkg/secrets-store/nodeserver.go 75.00% 1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
pkg/secrets-store/utils.go 60.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
cmd/secrets-store-csi-driver/main.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1622      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.83%   31.01%   -4.82%     
==========================================
  Files          63       57       -6     
  Lines        3759     3205     -554     
==========================================
- Hits         1347      994     -353     
+ Misses       2268     2108     -160     
+ Partials      144      103      -41     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nilekhc
Copy link
Contributor

nilekhc commented Oct 3, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@nilekhc nilekhc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First pass.

In bats tests, where sleep duration/timeout is increased, could you re-evaluate if it's necessary? If yes then could you add a note to make sure we have context?

pkg/secrets-store/secrets-store.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/secrets-store/secrets-store.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/secrets-store/secrets-store.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/secrets-store/nodeserver.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/bats/e2e-provider.bats Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/bats/aws.bats Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/bats/e2e-provider.bats Show resolved Hide resolved
@dargudear-google
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@dargudear-google
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@dargudear-google
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@dargudear-google
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Oct 24, 2024

@dargudear-google: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
release-secrets-store-csi-driver-e2e-azure 50ac633 link true /test release-secrets-store-csi-driver-e2e-azure

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dargudear-google
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants