fix: fix occasional e2e failure

[jwcesign]

Fixes #N/A

Description

When I run make e2etests, one failure is: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/karpenter/actions/runs/10590933040/job/29347492851

The context is as follows:
nodeclaim:

corresponding node:

So this PR tries to re-enqueue the item.

How was this change tested?

It always has failure if you try about 8 times, and I tried 20+ times, the following failure disappear

 [FAIL] Performance Provisioning [It] should do complex provisioning and complex drift
  /home/runner/work/karpenter/karpenter/test/suites/perf/scheduling_test.go:134

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jwcesign
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jonathan-innis for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @jwcesign. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[jwcesign]

By the way, should we re-enqueue the item if an unexpected error happens, like a broken Internet connection?

For example, the following code:

karpenter/pkg/controllers/nodeclaim/lifecycle/registration.go

Line 59 in 14f12dd

return reconcile.Result{}, fmt.Errorf("getting node for nodeclaim, %w", err)

I prefer to re-enqueue them, make the logic robust

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10630261456

Details

• 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
• 4 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 80.753%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
pkg/controllers/disruption/consolidation.go	4	87.25%

Totals
Change from base Build 10622339666:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	8391
Relevant Lines:	10391

---

💛 - Coveralls

[njtran]

This should be caught with our re-queue on nodes here: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/karpenter/blob/main/pkg/controllers/nodeclaim/lifecycle/controller.go#L136-L138

If we don't have a node when we first look at this, the node should be created, and re-trigger this reconciliation

[jwcesign]

It makes sense. Let me check on that.