Add support for TCP_UDP to NLB TargetGroups and Listeners (rebase)

[lyda]

This is a work in progress - I need to test it.

Issue

#1608 (comment)

And based on this PR: #2275

Description

Previously, aws-load-balancer-controller ignored extra overlapping
ServicePorts defined in the Kubernetes Service spec if the external port
numbers were the same even if the protocols were different (e.g. TCP:53,
UDP:53).

This behavior prevented users from exposing services that support TCP
and UDP on the same external load balancer port number.

This patch solves the problem by detecting when a user defines multiple
ServicePorts for the same external load balancer port number but using
TCP and UDP protocols separately. In such situations, a TCP_UDP
TargetGroup and Listener are created and SecurityGroup rules are
updated accordingly. If more than two ServicePorts are defined, only the
first two mergeable ServicePorts are used. Otherwise, the first
ServicePort is used.

Checklist

• [x ] Added tests that cover your change (if possible)
• Added/modified documentation as required (such as the README.md, or the docs directory)
• Manually tested
• [x ] Made sure the title of the PR is a good description that can go into the release notes

BONUS POINTS checklist: complete for good vibes and maybe prizes?! 🤯

• [x ] Backfilled missing tests for code in same general area 🎉
• [x ] Refactored something and made the world a better place 🌟

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lyda
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign m00nf1sh for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @lyda!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @lyda. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[danielloader]

Thanks for taking this up, I get to subscribe to another pull request now. Hope you have much better luck than the last one.

Just in time for HTTP3 going more mainstream!

[lyda]

OK, I think I've addressed the issues with the rebase. But the verify step is now failing. Any ideas why?

[lyda]

@M00nF1sh / @oliviassss : Hey there, I think this is done and reviewable. I've run it in a test EKS system and it does what I needed it to do. However I'm not an expert in this code base or with load balancers so would love feedback from yourselves. Thank you!

[z0rc]

There are a lot of mixed tab/space indentations introuduced in this file. It's quite prominent when viewing this file here in github (your text editor may mask this).

[lyda]

The new commit should fix that.

[z0rc]

Thanks.

I should've mentioned that other file has the same problem, see https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller/pull/3807/files#diff-6693c1d7b2a6b3427b842d416ef827dd9e1d10ae5e74a56bba442bb2d1595974R2299-R2560

[lyda]

Done.

In general it would likely be better to put json objects in json files so you'd avoid this mix of formatting; just have vim pipe the buffer to jq. But that sort of change seemed out of scope.