Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add crd Model and define crd Worker #180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

feat: add crd Model and define crd Worker #180

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

bjwswang
Copy link
Collaborator

@bjwswang bjwswang commented Nov 3, 2023

What type of PR is this?

/kind feat

What this PR does / why we need it

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Fixes #171

Special notes for your reviewer

@bjwswang bjwswang changed the title feat: add crd Model and Worker feat: add crd Model Nov 3, 2023
@bjwswang bjwswang changed the title feat: add crd Model [WIP]feat: add crd Model Nov 3, 2023
@bjwswang bjwswang marked this pull request as draft November 5, 2023 10:50
@bjwswang bjwswang marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2023 07:38
@bjwswang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bjwswang commented Nov 6, 2023

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Adding a new feature to the KubeAGI project, which includes a new Custom Resource Definition (CRD) for Model and Worker, and their corresponding controllers.
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces new features to the KubeAGI project. It adds a new Custom Resource Definition (CRD) for Model and Worker, and their corresponding controllers. It also includes changes to the Datasource controller and updates to the auto-generated deep copy functions. The PR also includes error handling and status update logic for the new CRDs.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 4
  • Explanation: The PR is quite large and involves several new features and changes to existing ones. It requires a good understanding of Kubernetes CRDs and controllers, as well as the specific logic of the KubeAGI project. Therefore, it requires a significant amount of time and effort to review.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and follows good practices for Kubernetes controllers and CRDs. However, it would be beneficial to add unit tests for the new features to ensure their correctness and prevent future regressions. Additionally, it would be helpful to add more comments in the code to explain the logic and purpose of certain functions and methods, especially for complex or critical parts of the code.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: controllers/model_controller.go
      suggestion: It seems like the error handling could be improved. In the Reconcile method, if the Get method returns an error other than IsNotFound, the error is returned immediately. It might be more appropriate to log the error and requeue the request, instead of stopping the reconciliation. [important]
      relevant line: if err := r.Get(ctx, req.NamespacedName, instance); err != nil {

    • relevant file: pkg/datasource/datasource.go
      suggestion: The Check method in the OSS struct could be improved by adding more specific error messages. Currently, it returns a generic error if the bucket or object does not exist. It would be more helpful to specify which one (bucket or object) does not exist in the error message. [medium]
      relevant line: if err := ds.Check(ctx, info); err != nil {

    • relevant file: controllers/model_controller.go
      suggestion: The Reconcile method could be simplified by breaking down its logic into smaller, more manageable functions. This would improve the readability and maintainability of the code. [medium]
      relevant line: func (r *ModelReconciler) Reconcile(ctx context.Context, req ctrl.Request) (ctrl.Result, error) {

    • relevant file: controllers/worker_controller.go
      suggestion: The Reconcile method in the WorkerReconciler struct is currently empty. It would be beneficial to implement the reconciliation logic or, if this is a work in progress, add a TODO comment to indicate that the implementation is pending. [important]
      relevant line: func (r *WorkerReconciler) Reconcile(ctx context.Context, req ctrl.Request) (ctrl.Result, error) {

How to use

Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@bjwswang bjwswang changed the title [WIP]feat: add crd Model [WIP]feat: add crd Model and define crd Worker Nov 6, 2023
@bjwswang bjwswang changed the title [WIP]feat: add crd Model and define crd Worker feat: add crd Model and define crd Worker Nov 6, 2023
@bjwswang bjwswang merged commit d353b16 into main Nov 6, 2023
8 checks passed
nkwangleiGIT pushed a commit to nkwangleiGIT/arcadia that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2023
feat: add crd Model and define crd Worker
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Define CRD Model
2 participants