Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dtype test for jax #19141

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

grasskin
Copy link
Member

@grasskin grasskin commented Feb 2, 2024

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (c8700f4) 80.14% compared to head (c2a960a) 75.52%.
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
keras/backend/jax/trainer.py 94.73% 0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #19141      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.14%   75.52%   -4.62%     
==========================================
  Files         341      357      +16     
  Lines       36163    38447    +2284     
  Branches     7116     7483     +367     
==========================================
+ Hits        28982    29037      +55     
- Misses       5578     7806    +2228     
- Partials     1603     1604       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
keras 75.38% <98.27%> (-4.61%) ⬇️
keras-jax 59.38% <65.51%> (-3.68%) ⬇️
keras-numpy 53.75% <29.31%> (-3.34%) ⬇️
keras-tensorflow 60.87% <38.79%> (-3.79%) ⬇️
keras-torch 60.12% <29.31%> (-3.75%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@grasskin grasskin marked this pull request as draft February 2, 2024 20:45
@gbaned gbaned requested a review from mattdangerw March 13, 2024 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants