operator/pkg/util: unit test patcher #5652
Conversation
karmada-bot
added
the
size/XL
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5652 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 39.02% 39.08% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 650 650
Lines 45207 45207
==========================================
+ Hits 17641 17671 +30
+ Misses 26207 26175 -32
- Partials 1359 1361 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
mohamedawnallah
force-pushed
the
unitTestPatcherOperatorPkg
branch
from
ca03df1
to
63b1263
Compare
In this commit, we unit test the patcher in the karmada operator pkg on patching the Deployment and StatefulSet K8S objects. Signed-off-by: Mohamed Awnallah <[email protected]>
|
@XiShanYongYe-Chang It looks like this PR didn’t merge automatically after receiving |
mohamedawnallah
force-pushed
the
unitTestPatcherOperatorPkg
branch
from
63b1263
to
5ef98ec
Compare
In addition to lgtm, the integration needs to be approved. /lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: XiShanYongYe-Chang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
karmada-bot
added
the
approved
Description
In this commit, we unit test the patcher in the karmada operator pkg on patching the Deployment and StatefulSet k8s manifests.
What type of PR is this?
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #5491.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: