Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add ci tag check to backup and restore build #301

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

MatthewErispe
Copy link
Collaborator

@MatthewErispe MatthewErispe commented Aug 12, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the build process for continuous integration environments, allowing for more flexible deployment configurations.
  • Improvements

    • Standardized environment variable usage across build scripts to ensure consistency in build configurations.

@rcrichton
Copy link
Member

Task linked: CU-86by9ch50 JeMPI MVP release

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the build process for the JeMPI application by introducing conditional logic for Docker image configurations in CI environments. By setting environment variables such as CI and TAG, the builds for JeMPI_BackupRestoreAPI and related components become more standardized and flexible, facilitating smoother deployments and consistent tagging across different environments.

Changes

Files Change Summary
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_BackupRestoreAPI/build.sh, JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh Introduced conditional logic in build.sh for CI environments, modifying the APP_IMAGE variable, and ensured environment variables CI and TAG are set for consistency across builds.

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, we hop and play,
With builds that flow like a bright sunny day.
CI brings colors, in tags they gleam,
Docker images dance, like a sweet dream.
Hoppity hop, let the changes unfold,
In our coding burrow, new tales are told! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23066ca and d38d9c1.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_BackupRestoreAPI/build.sh (1 hunks)
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Shellcheck
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_BackupRestoreAPI/build.sh

[warning] 14-14: APP_IMAGE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).

(SC2034)

Additional comments not posted (2)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_BackupRestoreAPI/build.sh (1)

13-15: Verify the usage of APP_IMAGE.

The APP_IMAGE variable is conditionally set but not used within the script. Ensure that it is utilized in subsequent commands or exported if needed externally.

Verification successful

Usage of APP_IMAGE Verified

The APP_IMAGE variable is used in the build-app-image.sh script for Docker image operations, confirming its utilization after being set in the build.sh script. No changes are necessary.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `APP_IMAGE` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for occurrences of `APP_IMAGE` after it is set. Expect: Usage in subsequent commands or export.
rg --type shell -A 5 $'APP_IMAGE='

Length of output: 63


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for occurrences of `APP_IMAGE` in all shell scripts.

# Test: Search for occurrences of `APP_IMAGE` in the repository. Expect: Usage in subsequent commands or export.
rg 'APP_IMAGE=' -A 5

Length of output: 6537


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for occurrences of `APP_IMAGE` in the build-app-image.sh script.

# Test: Search for `APP_IMAGE` in the build-app-image.sh script to verify its usage.
rg 'APP_IMAGE' JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_BackupRestoreAPI/../build-app-image.sh

Length of output: 366

Tools
Shellcheck

[warning] 14-14: APP_IMAGE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).

(SC2034)

JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh (1)

43-43: LGTM! Consistent environment variable usage.

The addition of CI and TAG environment variables aligns with other build commands, enhancing consistency across the build processes.

Copy link
Contributor

@martino-jembi martino-jembi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MatthewErispe Looking good to me.

@MatthewErispe MatthewErispe merged commit 7d83d98 into dev Aug 12, 2024
5 checks passed
@MatthewErispe MatthewErispe deleted the CU-86by9ch50_JeMPI-MVP-release branch August 12, 2024 12:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants