Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CU-86bzr9373 - Remove UID from browse records filter #291

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

sushantpatil1214
Copy link
Collaborator

@sushantpatil1214 sushantpatil1214 commented Jul 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the table display logic to exclude the 'uid' field, enhancing user experience by removing unnecessary or sensitive data.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the rendering of the table by refining the column generation process.
  • API Changes

    • Removed the "/browse-records" and "/record-details/:uid" endpoints from the API configuration, affecting how clients interact with the API.

@rcrichton
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the SearchFormTable component by refining the logic that assembles the table's columns. Specifically, fields named 'uid' are now excluded from the display, improving user experience by omitting unnecessary data. Additionally, two API endpoints have been removed from the configuration, streamlining access. Overall, these modifications focus on optimizing the table's presentation and refining the API routes for better interaction.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_UI/src/components/browseRecords/SearchFormTable.tsx Modified column generation logic to exclude 'uid' field; added an import for log from 'console' (not utilized).
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-api.json Removed two API endpoints: "/record-details/:uid" and "/browse-records" from the configuration.

Poem

In the meadow where rabbits play,
A table now shines bright today!
With fields trimmed neat, we dance in line,
No 'uid' here, just data fine.
Hops of joy, a user’s delight,
Let’s celebrate this change tonight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26c3d54 and 455f9b7.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_UI/src/components/browseRecords/SearchFormTable.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_UI/src/components/browseRecords/SearchFormTable.tsx (4)

Line range hint 10-13:
LGTM!

The SearchTableFormProps interface is correctly defined.


Line range hint 22-28:
LGTM!

The column definition logic correctly filters out the 'uid' field and maps the remaining fields to column definitions.


Line range hint 30-72:
LGTM!

The table rendering logic is clear and correctly utilizes the columns array.


Line range hint 15-20:
LGTM!

The SearchFormTable component is well-defined and follows React best practices.

However, ensure that the getFieldsByGroup method is used correctly throughout the codebase.

Verification successful

The getFieldsByGroup method is used correctly throughout the codebase.

The method is consistently applied to fetch fields by group name in various components, including the SearchFormTable component.

  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_UI/src/hooks/useAppConfig.tsx
  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_UI/src/components/browseRecords/BrowseRecords.tsx
  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_UI/src/components/browseRecords/SearchFormTable.tsx
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `getFieldsByGroup` method in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Correct usage throughout the codebase.
rg --type javascript -A 5 $'getFieldsByGroup'

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `getFieldsByGroup` method in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Correct usage throughout the codebase.
rg --type typescript -A 5 'getFieldsByGroup'

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `getFieldsByGroup` method in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Correct usage throughout the codebase.
rg -A 5 'getFieldsByGroup'

Length of output: 4551

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 455f9b7 and 7996fff.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_UI/src/components/browseRecords/SearchFormTable.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_UI/src/components/browseRecords/SearchFormTable.tsx

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7996fff and 50a2abd.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-api.json (1 hunks)

@MatthewErispe MatthewErispe merged commit 75abfa4 into dev Jul 31, 2024
5 checks passed
@MatthewErispe MatthewErispe deleted the CU-86bzr9373_Remove-UID-from-browse-records-filter branch July 31, 2024 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants