Introduce Cookbook #424
Introduce Cookbook #424
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
0x009922
added
documentation
M-meta
outoftardis
force-pushed
the
init-cookbook
branch
from
dcc9a56
to
ff6de2a
Compare
|
I'm using a temp branch with restructured docs as the base for this change in order for us to see the whole picture |
outoftardis
force-pushed
the
init-cookbook
branch
from
ff6de2a
to
a218531
Compare
outoftardis
force-pushed
the
init-cookbook
branch
from
bb83a04
to
69322de
Compare
outoftardis
force-pushed
the
init-cookbook
branch
from
69322de
to
1b2cca8
Compare
outoftardis
force-pushed
the
init-cookbook
branch
from
1b2cca8
to
68a62ae
Compare
.vitepress/config.mts
Outdated
| text: 'Events and Filters', | ||
| collapsed: true, | ||
| items: [ | ||
| { | ||
| text: 'Pipeline Events', | ||
| collapsed: true, | ||
| items: [], | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| text: 'Data Events', | ||
| collapsed: true, | ||
| items: [], | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| text: 'Trigger Events', | ||
| collapsed: true, | ||
| items: [], | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| text: 'Advanced Filtering', | ||
| collapsed: true, | ||
| items: [], | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this also needs more details, what kind of example can we include here? just "work with {event type}"? or something else?
| magical_keys.clone(), | ||
| AssetValueType::Numeric(NumericSpec::integer()), | ||
| ).mintable_once() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This snippet registers an asset with mintable_once, which is different from a non-mintable asset.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I took the example from the integration tests: https://github.com/hyperledger/iroha/blob/v2.0.0-pre-rc.21.1/client/tests/integration/non_mintable.rs#L12
|
|
||
| ```rust | ||
| fn mint_non_mintable_asset( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If it's non-mintable, how could we mint it 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good question, I think the mintability naming is unfortunate, and we should rethink it. But that's an issue for the main repo
| RegisterExpr::new(AssetDefinition::quantity(asset_definition_id.clone())); | ||
|
|
||
| let _hash = admin_client.submit_all_blocking({ | ||
| let isi: [InstructionExpr; 3] = [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| let isi: [InstructionExpr; 3] = [ | |
| let isi: [InstructionBox; _] = [ |
| ]; | ||
| isi | ||
| })?; | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this example needs to be reworked, it doesn't work like this
| ```rust [Rust] | ||
| let error = mad_hatter_client | ||
| .request(client::asset::by_id(asset_id.clone())) | ||
| .expect_err("Asset should not be found"); | ||
|
|
||
| assert!(matches!( | ||
| error, | ||
| ClientQueryError::Validation(ValidationFail::QueryFailed(QueryExecutionFail::Find( | ||
| FindError::Asset(_) | ||
| ))) | ||
| )); | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What if this account has already that asset? Is there any reliable way to check? Is there any way to store partially signed transaction?
nxsaken
added
E-examples
Signed-off-by: Nurzhan Sakén <[email protected]>
(ideally) Closes #423
As of now, a very raw structure of examples that might be useful for users. Will need to add some real content with: