-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add T5-TTS library #965
Add T5-TTS library #965
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks :)
repoName: "T5-TTS", | ||
repoUrl: "https://github.com/SWivid/F5-TTS", | ||
filter: false, | ||
countDownloads: `path_extension:"safetensors" OR path_extension:"pt"`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you know why they went for a solution with both E2_TTS and F5_TTS in the same repo? Doing so doesn't allow for separate counting. If you are in contact with them, would be good to nudge them to split.
The current download rule looks good though, no matter if the models get split in 2 repos are not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @SWivid would you like to have separate download counts for the E2_TTS and F5_TTS checkpoints?
If yes, then it makes sense to split them up into 2 separate model repositories.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it influences the current spaces using it ?
If not, would like to split it up, otherwise thought it's just OK for having F5 and reproduce E2 there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes so the current Spaces are assuming both are present in the same model repo, see e.g. https://huggingface.co/spaces/mrfakename/E2-F5-TTS/blob/main/app.py#L53.
So updating that would break existing Spaces
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I would suggest is:
- create a new repo for E2-TTS with E2 checkpoints
- open a PR on https://huggingface.co/spaces/mrfakename/E2-F5-TTS to point to the new repo
- remove the E2-TTS weights from F5-TTS repo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed! Seperate repos would be better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, @SWivid would you be up for that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure, i'll take care of it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@NielsRogge sorry for the delay, just got repo split and E2 removed from F5 repo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Note that both model repos would require library_name: f5-tts
for downloads to work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks both!
repoName: "F5-TTS", | ||
repoUrl: "https://github.com/SWivid/F5-TTS", | ||
filter: false, | ||
countDownloads: `path_extension:"safetensors"`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was it intentional to remove .pt files from the count? IIUC users will download either one or the other but not both, correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔥
This PR ensures downloads work for https://huggingface.co/SWivid/F5-TTS.
cc @SWivid