-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ALMA-Fix: nwbib without explicit URI #1542
Comments
For the record, only one of thee examples is a ZDB resource: https://test.lobid.org/resources/990205221730206441.json Generally, all of the 872 resources are part of NWBib but only 258 are also in ZDB So, the recent ZDB update (hbz/nwbib#465) does not seem the (main) root of this problem. |
I think all these entries use notations/URIs that do not exist in the classifications, see also hbz/nwbib#595. Will discuss with NWBib editors how to proceed. |
@acka47 can we close this ticket? since it will be resolved in hbz/nwbib#595 |
Ok. Closing. |
https://test.lobid.org/resources/search?q=subject.source.id%3A%22nwbib%22
When introducing new classifications I found a 800+ entries with faulty nwbib subject entries in
084
. Reason for that seems to be that they have no nwbib-URI just the classification OR the some mixture. Even some old spatial entries.https://test.lobid.org/resources/990205221730206441.json
https://test.lobid.org/resources/990227427410206441.json
https://test.lobid.org/resources/990364878140206441.json
https://test.lobid.org/resources/99370684055406441.json
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: