Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ALMA-Fix: nwbib without explicit URI #1542

Closed
TobiasNx opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

ALMA-Fix: nwbib without explicit URI #1542

TobiasNx opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor

TobiasNx commented Dec 6, 2022

https://test.lobid.org/resources/search?q=subject.source.id%3A%22nwbib%22

When introducing new classifications I found a 800+ entries with faulty nwbib subject entries in 084. Reason for that seems to be that they have no nwbib-URI just the classification OR the some mixture. Even some old spatial entries.

https://test.lobid.org/resources/990205221730206441.json

    {
      "notation": "582000",
      "type": [
        "Concept"
      ],
      "source": {
        "label": "nwbib",
        "id": "nwbib"
      }
    },

https://test.lobid.org/resources/990227427410206441.json

    {
      "notation": "Mundartenhttps://nwbib.de/subjects#N744000",
      "type": [
        "Concept"
      ],
      "source": {
        "label": "nwbib",
        "id": "nwbib"
      }
    }

https://test.lobid.org/resources/990364878140206441.json

   {
      "notation": "Heilige. Heiligenverehrung ; https://nwbib.de/subjects#N611090",
      "type": [
        "Concept"
      ],
      "source": {
        "label": "nwbib",
        "id": "nwbib"
      }
    }

https://test.lobid.org/resources/99370684055406441.json

   {
      "notation": "99 ; Bonn",
      "type": [
        "Concept"
      ],
      "source": {
        "label": "nwbib",
        "id": "nwbib"
      }
    },
    {
      "notation": "794010",
      "type": [
        "Concept"
      ],
      "source": {
        "label": "nwbib",
        "id": "nwbib"
      }
    }
@acka47
Copy link
Contributor

acka47 commented Dec 8, 2022

For the record, only one of thee examples is a ZDB resource: https://test.lobid.org/resources/990205221730206441.json

Generally, all of the 872 resources are part of NWBib but only 258 are also in ZDB

So, the recent ZDB update (hbz/nwbib#465) does not seem the (main) root of this problem.

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor

acka47 commented Dec 8, 2022

I think all these entries use notations/URIs that do not exist in the classifications, see also hbz/nwbib#595. Will discuss with NWBib editors how to proceed.

@TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor Author

@acka47 can we close this ticket? since it will be resolved in hbz/nwbib#595

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor

acka47 commented Mar 16, 2023

Ok. Closing.

@acka47 acka47 closed this as completed Mar 16, 2023
dr0i added a commit to dr0i/lobid-resources that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2023
dr0i added a commit to dr0i/lobid-resources that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants