-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add GHC 9.10.1 to the versions tested in CI #105
Conversation
Hmm, the CI failure seems to be a bug in haskell-ci: The update to |
78bc041
to
6abd757
Compare
@andreasabel suggested to use his fork of Since we don't have to fix anything for |
@Mikolaj haskell-ci fixed this in upstream as well in haskell-CI/haskell-ci#730 . Do you want me to refresh the CI configuration, or is this ok for the moment? |
@BinderDavid: if you have a spare moment, that sounds like a good thing to do. :) |
6abd757
to
16f6951
Compare
@Mikolaj Done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Anything else before we merge? |
No, I think this is fine. Can you do a metadata revision on Hackage to bump the upper bound on base? This would allow me to make |
I've done the revision. Please check in 1h if that's what you wanted and if Hackage serves it fine. Merging. Thank you! |
I used
haskell-ci
from the current master branch of the haskell-ci repo, since the published version of haskell-ci doesn't support 9.10 yet.