Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Docs, Batch] Document need for copying keys in developer namespaces #14664

Merged

Conversation

cjllanwarne
Copy link
Collaborator

Based on the discussions here.

It seems that this is not the most desirable eventual state, but for now, it seems better to document this than ignore it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@chrisvittal chrisvittal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is helpful. Thanks for adding it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@patrick-schultz patrick-schultz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for writing this down!

@hail-ci-robot hail-ci-robot merged commit 558dc86 into hail-is:main Aug 28, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@cjllanwarne cjllanwarne deleted the cjl_document_gsa_key_copying branch August 28, 2024 16:45
cjllanwarne added a commit to cjllanwarne/hail that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
… rotate_keys.py (hail-is#14735)

## Change Description

Corrects our gsa-key copying instructions (from hail-is#14664) to copy the key
contents, not the entire secret metadata.

The batch service seems resilient to these badly formed secrets, but the
rotate_keys.py script was not.

## Security Assessment

Delete all except the correct answer:
- This change has a low security impact


### Impact Description

- Not a production change
- Does not add any new information to the secrets, only formats them a
useable way.
- Only in dev namespaces

(Reviewers: please confirm the security impact before approving)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants