Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use emoionml names for fsre and pad dimensions #38

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

drevicko
Copy link
Contributor

This lines up the names in the conversion plugins with the emotionML suggested vocab.

emoml has different names for the 4-dimensional fsre scheme and the 3-dimensional vad scheme, which this pull request has added.

I've added the "unpredictability" dimension and mapped big6:surprise to it's maximum value. The assumption is that surprise varies between 5 and 10 to be in line with the other dimensions (no such thing as negative surprise, so no values less than 5). I see that arousal also has all values >5 (so no negative arousal). Ideally, surprise mappings for V, A and D should be calculated empirically - I think there'll be some arousal and possibly slightly lowered dominance.

I wonder if we should use another colon in the emoml names, eg: "emoml:fsredim:valence" or "emoml:big6:happiness", since the emoml suggested vocab only specifies names like "happiness" in a category "big6" (ie: it's hard to know which is the category in "big6happiness").
We'd have to go through the example plugins and make sure they also conform...

open to discussion on this btw...

ps: apologies for multiple changes in this one pr..

This lines up the names in the conversion plugins with the [emotionML suggested vocab](https://www.w3.org/TR/emotion-voc/#dimensions).

emoml has different names for the 4-dimensional fsre scheme and the 3-dimensional vad scheme, which this pull request has added.

I've added the "unpredictability" dimension and mapped big6:surprise to it's maximum value. The assumption is that surprise varies between 5 and 10 to be in line with the other dimensions (no such thing as negative surprise, so no values less than 5). I see that arousal also has all values >5 (so no negative arousal). Ideally, surprise mappings for V, A and D should be calculated empirically - I think there'll be some arousal and possibly slightly lowered dominance.

I wonder if we should use another colon in the emoml names, eg: "emoml:fsredim:valence" or "emoml:big6:happiness", since the [emoml suggested vocab](https://www.w3.org/TR/emotion-voc/xml) only specifies names like "happiness" in a category "big6" (ie: it's hard to know which is the category in "big6happiness").
We'd have to go through the example plugins and make sure they also conform...

open to discussion on this btw...

ps: apologies for multiple changes in this one pr..
@gsi-bot gsi-bot force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 723b4a7 to a82e4ed Compare October 30, 2018 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant