Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parent observations for general agent #456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kongzii
Copy link
Contributor

@kongzii kongzii commented Sep 9, 2024

I forgot to add parent observation to general agent and now it looks like this, so fixing:

Screenshot by Dropbox Capture

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several changes across multiple files within the prediction market agent project. Key modifications include the addition of an @observe() decorator to the get_goal method in the GoalManager class, a renaming of the run_agent function to run_general_agent_streamlit in the app.py file, and the introduction of a new run_general_agent method in the DeployableAgent class within deploy.py. These changes enhance tracking and modularity of the code without altering the core functionalities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
prediction_market_agent/agents/goal_manager.py Added @observe() decorator to get_goal(self) -> Goal method in GoalManager class.
prediction_market_agent/agents/microchain_agent/app.py Renamed run_agent(agent: Agent, iterations: int, model: SupportedModel) -> None to run_general_agent_streamlit(agent: Agent, iterations: int, model: SupportedModel) -> None.
prediction_market_agent/agents/microchain_agent/deploy.py Added run_general_agent(self, market_type: MarketType) -> None method to DeployableAgent class and modified run method to call this new method.

Possibly related issues

  • Unify main.py and prediction_market_agent/run.py #211: The changes in this PR may facilitate the unification of agent execution by providing a clearer structure through the renaming and modularization, aligning with the goal of consolidating entry points for running agents.

Possibly related PRs

Tip

New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

  • Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

  • Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8da559 and 3f2351e.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • prediction_market_agent/agents/goal_manager.py (1 hunks)
  • prediction_market_agent/agents/microchain_agent/app.py (2 hunks)
  • prediction_market_agent/agents/microchain_agent/deploy.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
prediction_market_agent/agents/microchain_agent/deploy.py (2)

58-59: Approved: Refactored run method to delegate to run_general_agent.

The change simplifies the run method and enhances modularity by delegating responsibilities. Ensure that run_general_agent is thoroughly tested to handle all scenarios previously covered by run.

Verification successful

Verified: The integration of run_general_agent is consistent with the refactoring.

The run method's refactoring to delegate to run_general_agent is correctly implemented, with no inconsistencies found in the codebase. The function is only called with the expected signature.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `run_general_agent` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type python -A 5 $'run_general_agent'

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `run_general_agent` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type py -A 5 $'run_general_agent'

Length of output: 2560


60-64: Approved: New run_general_agent method with observability enhancements.

The method is well-structured and the use of @observe() is appropriate for tracking and logging purposes. Consider enhancing error handling and ensure comprehensive testing, especially for the new interactions introduced.

prediction_market_agent/agents/goal_manager.py (1)

217-217: Approved: Addition of @observe() decorator to get_goal.

The decorator enhances the method's observability, which is beneficial for monitoring and debugging. Verify that the decorator does not introduce unintended side effects or performance issues.

prediction_market_agent/agents/microchain_agent/app.py (1)

69-71: Approved: Renaming of run_agent to run_general_agent_streamlit.

The renaming clarifies the function's specific use within the Streamlit framework. Ensure that all references to the old function name have been updated across the application.

Verification successful

Renaming Verified: No Remaining References to run_agent as a Function Name

The function run_agent has been successfully renamed to run_general_agent_streamlit, and there are no remaining references to the old function name in the codebase. The occurrences found were unrelated to the function name itself.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all references to the old function name `run_agent` have been updated.

# Test: Search for the old function name. Expect: No occurrences of `run_agent`.
rg --type python -A 5 $'run_agent'

Length of output: 64


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all references to the old function name `run_agent` have been updated.

# Test: Search for the old function name. Expect: No occurrences of `run_agent`.
rg --type py -A 5 $'run_agent'

Length of output: 2761

@kongzii kongzii merged commit d42dd68 into main Sep 10, 2024
8 checks passed
@kongzii kongzii deleted the peter/generallangfusefix branch September 10, 2024 06:47
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants