Run uv lock under Python 3.9

[nsoranzo]

Fix:

Using CPython 3.8.18 interpreter at: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.18/x64/bin/python
  × No solution found when resolving dependencies for split
  │ (python_full_version == '3.9.*'):
  ╰─▶ Because only the following versions of rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'} are available:
          rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'}<=33.6.1
          rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'}>=34.0.0,<=34.6.0
          rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'}>=35.0.0
      and all of:
          rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'}>=33.6.0,<=33.6.1
          rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'}>=34.0.0,<=34.6.0
          rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'}>=35.0.0
      require Python >=3.9, <4, we can conclude that all of:
          rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'}>=33.6.0,<33.6.1
          ...
          rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'}>35.4.1,<35.5.0
          rucio-clients{python_full_version >= '3.9'}>35.5.0
       are incompatible.
      And because galaxy:dev depends on rucio-clients{python_full_version >=
      '3.9'}>=33.6.0 and your project depends on galaxy:dev, we can conclude
      that your project's requirements are unsatisfiable.

      hint: The source distribution for rucio-clients{python_full_version >=
      '3.9'}==35.5.0 does not include static metadata. Generating metadata for
      this package requires Python >=3.9, <4, but Python 3.8.18 is installed.

See https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/actions/runs/11684632042/job/32536277008

How to test the changes?

(Select all options that apply)

• I've included appropriate automated tests.
• This is a refactoring of components with existing test coverage.
• Instructions for manual testing are as follows:
  1. I've tested this on my fork: https://github.com/nsoranzo/galaxy/actions/runs/11694467700/job/32568116605

License

• I agree to license these and all my past contributions to the core galaxy codebase under the MIT license.

[github-actions]

This PR was merged without a "kind/" label, please correct.