Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

philmel: cleanup #893

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

philmel: cleanup #893

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

FFHener
Copy link
Contributor

@FFHener FFHener commented Jul 16, 2024

I had a meeting with @patrella and we definied together how the location will look like after the maintenance work.

Please review, but do not merge as it doenst reflect the current state. I will merge it after the on site work is done

@FFHener FFHener force-pushed the philmel-cleanup branch 2 times, most recently from b72b78e to 18da6a9 Compare July 26, 2024 11:06
@FFHener FFHener marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2024 11:40
@FFHener FFHener requested review from noxilixon and booo July 29, 2024 17:55
Copy link
Contributor

@noxilixon noxilixon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

model: "mikrotik_sxtsq-5-ac"
mac_override: {eth0: TODO}

# TODO: For the peer GSBS2 802.11s is not working
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Opinion: change the hardware/software of GSBS2 to match the current standard.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not that 802.11s is not working but it's only working on indoor channels or none-DFS channels with reduced output power. Therefore we need outdoor AP mode SSIDs for all towers if we deploy OpenWRT devices.

Setting up a tower with multiple nodes in 802.11s on the same channel is also a bad idea. We should follow a concept similar to the UBNT APs with the OpenWRT APs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But that means that for the moment the Output power for the link to be established is to low on non-DFS Channels?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I remember.

The indoor channels are for indoor use and the indoor channels are quite crowded too.

model: "ubnt_nanostation-m2_xm"
wireless_profile: freifunk_default
model: "mikrotik_sxtsq-5-ac"
mac_override: {eth0: TODO}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Obviously missing mac here, don't forget to add before merge

- hostname: philmel-nf-w-5ghz
role: ap
model: "mikrotik_sxtsq-5-ac"
mac_override: {eth0: TODO}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Obviously missing mac here, don't forget to add before merge

# ROUTER: 10.230.2.0/24
# --MGMT: 10.230.2.0/27
# --MESH: 10.230.2.32/27
# --FREE: 10.230.2.64/27
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And 10.230.2.96/27 also?

@FFHener FFHener marked this pull request as draft July 30, 2024 12:04
@FFHener
Copy link
Contributor Author

FFHener commented Aug 27, 2024

@Petrella are you up for making this PR ready so we can merge it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants