Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prove Lemma 5.2.1 #77

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024
Merged

Prove Lemma 5.2.1 #77

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

js2357
Copy link
Contributor

@js2357 js2357 commented Jul 14, 2024

Prove Lemma 5.2.1.

Notes:

  • I changed the definition of highDensityTiles to use a strict inequality. I think this was a typo in the blueprint, since everything else seems consistent with a strict inequality. I also updated the definition in the blueprint.
  • The proof in the blueprint had an extra factor of 2, so the Lemma 5.2.1 that I proved is stronger by a factor of 2. I also updated the statement and proof in the blueprint.
  • I changed the statement of measure_biUnion_le_lintegral to use ℝ≥0∞ rather than ℝ≥0. This was only to avoid some annoying casting; none of the numbers involved in the proof are infinite, so the ℝ≥0 version should theoretically be adequate. If the ℝ≥0∞ version turns out to be substantially harder to prove, it should be possible to change back to the original version and deal with the casts in the proof of Lemma 5.2.1 instead. I added a comment to this effect before measure_biUnion_le_lintegral.

@fpvandoorn
Copy link
Owner

Thanks, this is great! The changes look good to me.

@fpvandoorn fpvandoorn merged commit 1e56387 into fpvandoorn:master Jul 15, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants