-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: ensure aiokafka commit is called with kafka.structs.TopicPartiti… #541
fix: ensure aiokafka commit is called with kafka.structs.TopicPartiti… #541
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #541 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93.73% 93.70% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 102 102
Lines 11149 11154 +5
Branches 1532 1534 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 10450 10452 +2
- Misses 611 614 +3
Partials 88 88
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
261e61e
to
3275ea8
Compare
Thanks for spending the time investigating this, you wouldn't believe how much of a favor this is. Lint the PR and it should be good! |
3275ea8
to
1c0102b
Compare
Sorry had it done but not commited yet. 👍🏻 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Weird, this seems to have fixed the PyPy tests as well? I've never seen them pass before in CI/CD. Thank you, LGTM!
Wait, it seems the PyPy test is erroneously marked as passing. I wonder if something in the workflow logic got updated to mark as passing when experimental. |
Didn't do anything related to that. Should I? |
No need for concern on your end, just got excited too soon about PyPy tests. |
Make sure
AIOKafkaConsumer.commit()
receives compatible TopicPartition class. (Fixes #539)