This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 30, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
elb 3.3 spec
Steve Jones edited this page Sep 6, 2017
·
3 revisions
- In-Region Load Balancing Service
- Distributes traffic across multiple Availability Zones
- HTTP/S, TCP/S
- Built-in Health Check
- Fully fault-tolerant
- Can span multiple AZs
- SSL termination
- Runtime reconfiguration of the service (i.e., no restarting allowed)
- Multi-tenancy (i.e., possible to configure multiple load balancing inbounds with seperate pools of outbound endpoints)
- Arbitrary TCP load balancing
- HTTP/HTTPs Session stickiness (both application level and load balancer level)
- DNS vhosting
- Endpoint health monitoring
- Metric collection
- Latency
- RequestCount
- HTTP Response code counts (e.g., 400, 404, 500, etc.)
- ELB is a service but runs on EC2
- The IP Addresses will change over time
- Use CNAME records in DNS or Route 53 “Alias” records
- SSL is supported
- Client SSL Termination
- Backend ELB-to-Server mutual SSL
- Sticky sessions
The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate viable software based load balancers and vet their conformance to fundamental requirements for ELB. These are:
- Fundamental ELB requirements
- SSL termination
- Runtime reconfiguration of the service (i.e., no restarting allowed)
- Multi-tenancy (i.e., possible to configure multiple load balancing inbounds with seperate pools of outbound endpoints)
- Arbitrary TCP load balancing
- HTTP/HTTPs Session stickiness (both application level and load balancer level)
- DNS vhosting
- Endpoint health monitoring
- Metric collection
- Latency
- RequestCount
- HTTP Response code counts (e.g., 400, 404, 500, etc.)
For each of the below listed load balancers:
- Evaluate and report on
- The support for functionality in the above listed requirements.
- The availability in distributions.
- A simple performance experiment comparing native execution vs. execution in a virtual machine.
- nginx - http://wiki.nginx.org/Main
- HA proxy - http://haproxy.1wt.eu/
- Zen - http://sourceforge.net/projects/zenloadbalancer/
- pound - http://www.apsis.ch/pound/
- software f5; software big ip
- impl details related to zone coverage
- e.g., zone goes down elb can cross zones to continue service
- identification of things we need (to change) in existing APIs
- list needed to consider scheduling
- versions of protocols we support HTTP,HTTPS,TLSv?,SSLv?
- types of session management wrt load balancing
- affinities, stickinesses,
- ssl termination (at lb?)
- ipv6 - out of scope? guessing yes.
- initially a eucalyptus component
- software reference implementation
- support for hardware future requirement
- configuration, esp. compared to what can be configured in AWS (e.g., http connections time outs)
- candidates for reference software implementation
- ha proxy
- nginx
- glassfish plugin: probably doesn't work for us
- squid
- linux virtual server
- momentum si?
- future hardware support expected:
- big ip f5
- preconfigured load balancing rules
- what is the functional spec/use cases
- implications on deployment (e.g., backup power, network hardware/topology)
- survey of customer load balancing use cases, infrastructure?
- hybrid use case/story? importance?
- tightly coupled with autoscaling? is that use case central?
- use cases are satisfied by elb?
- is there any case which is not satisfiable by ELB?
tag:rls-3.3 tag:elb