-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 228
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #585 from gitr0n1n/CDC
CDC
- Loading branch information
Showing
4 changed files
with
40 additions
and
30 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
30 changes: 0 additions & 30 deletions
30
...nt/blog/2020-10-02-core-devs-call-15-ecip-1049-keccak-breakout-call/index.en.md
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
File renamed without changes
File renamed without changes
40 changes: 40 additions & 0 deletions
40
...blog/2020-10-02-core-devs-call-15-ecip-1049-keccak-breakout-session/index.en.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: "ETC Core Devs Call 15: ECIP-1049 Keccak Breakout Session" | ||
date: 2020-10-02 | ||
author: r0n1n | ||
tags: ["announcement", "development", "education", "teams", "hardfork", "media"] | ||
--- | ||
|
||
![ETC Core Devs Call 15 - ECIP-1049 Keccak Breakout Session](./ethereum_classic_ecip_wallpaper.png) | ||
|
||
## ETC Core Devs Call 15 - ECIP-1049 Keccak Breakout Session | ||
|
||
* When: Friday, October 2nd, 2020, 4pm UTC, 120 minutes max. | ||
* Where: [Discord](https://discord.gg/3ZbKvb) | ||
* Focus: SHA3-256/Keccak256 Mining Algorithm Change Opposition Formal Conversation | ||
|
||
## Agenda | ||
|
||
* Review opposition comments. | ||
* Give the authors a chance to discuss the opposition concerns on voice recording. | ||
* Goal: Work at finding consensus as suggested by the [ECIP process](https://github.com/ethereumclassic/ECIPs#avoiding-network-splits). | ||
|
||
### Please review the issue thread to find the most up to date information. | ||
|
||
* [https://github.com/ethereumclassic/ECIPs/issues/382](https://github.com/ethereumclassic/ECIPs/issues/382) | ||
|
||
### Recording of Core Devs Call 15 | ||
|
||
* https://vimeo.com/464336957 | ||
|
||
### Conclusion | ||
|
||
* At this moment, Consensus did not appear to be present for ECIP-1049 due to many unanswered questions. | ||
* Recommendation from the collective call was to keep ECIP-1049 in `Last Call`, while the network analyzes the impacts of other `Accepted` proposals like [ECIP-1099](https://github.com/ethereumclassic/ECIPs/issues/368) and [MESS](https://github.com/ethereumclassic/ECIPs/issues/374). | ||
* It was recommended the ECIP-1049 authors work to clarify the proposal's specs/motives to draft a more solidified version of the proposal before being considered for `Accepted` or `Rejected` status. | ||
|
||
Please direct future commentary to the ECIP 1049 discussion thread: | ||
|
||
* https://github.com/ethereumclassic/ECIPs/issues/13 | ||
|
||
![ETC Core Devs Call 15 - ECIP-1049 Keccak Breakout Session](./etc_cdc.png) |