-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] dns: add support for clusters based on SRV DNS record #35160
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Galanin <[email protected]>
CC @envoyproxy/api-shepherds: Your approval is needed for changes made to |
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Galanin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Galanin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Galanin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Galanin <[email protected]>
Testing locally with Consul:
Add service nodes:
Verify that the service
main doc: https://developer.hashicorp.com/consul/docs/services/discovery/dns-static-lookups |
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Galanin <[email protected]>
Hi there, apologies for openning in this state - I acknowledge that there still lots. |
Thanks for you contribution. But based on our contributing rules (see https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md), any extension, should have a maintainer sponsor to help review and maintain the code. And I think this should be a DNS extension rather than a new cluster extension? |
@wbpcode, Thank you for your comment. I posted a message in slack some while ago but didn't hear anything back. What would be the right way for this?
Based on previous discussion, it was decided to go with the cluster extension. Basically, I followed the previous proposal. I will be happy to discuss the new design if someone helps me to find the right place. The initial issue doesn't seem to have activity :/ |
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Please feel free to give a status update now, ping for review, or re-open when it's ready. Thank you for your contributions! |
This isn't yet forgotten, going to ping maintainers in the maillist |
One more attempt to address #125 (resolve cluster IPs via SRV-record)
Yet on early stage. Tested with Consul and the collowing configuration:
Based on discussion and design doc by @kylebevans in #125 (comment)