Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use pip install instead of the deprecated python setup.py install #182

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2024

Conversation

mdickinson
Copy link
Member

@mdickinson mdickinson commented Mar 1, 2024

Our bleeding edge tests are failing. This PR may fix that.

Test run: https://github.com/enthought/scimath/actions/runs/8111735158

@mdickinson
Copy link
Member Author

This worked. We're getting warnings about using outdated actions, but those can be fixed separately.

@corranwebster Would you be available for a quick review?

@mdickinson mdickinson merged commit 3503770 into main Mar 1, 2024
25 checks passed
@mdickinson mdickinson deleted the fix/setup-py-install branch March 1, 2024 13:47
mdickinson added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024
We're getting warnings about outdated GitHub Actions. This PR brings all
actions up to the most recent versions.

~I'm not yet sure whether it's safe to remove the use of
GabrielBB/xvfb-action@v1 altogether or whether we need to introduce an
explicit use of `xvfb-run -a` on Ubuntu workers. Testing that workflow
is currently blocked by the `python setup.py install` failure fixed in
#182.~

Update: #182 is merged, and it looks as though everything's working
despite the removal of the xvfb-action.

Test run: https://github.com/enthought/scimath/actions/runs/8112365378
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants