Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

treewide: deprecate simID and recID in Association types for EDM4eic 4.0.0 #970

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

veprbl
Copy link
Member

@veprbl veprbl commented Sep 15, 2023

This prepares EICrecon for the changes in eic/EDM4eic#51. simID and recID fields will be filled while they are available. After, the same values (plus the collection IDs) will be still accessible from the sim and rec relations.

@github-actions github-actions bot added topic: calorimetry relates to calorimetry topic: PID Relates to PID reconstruction labels Sep 15, 2023
@veprbl veprbl temporarily deployed to github-pages September 15, 2023 06:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@veprbl veprbl added this to the 1.6.0 for 23.10.0 milestone Sep 18, 2023
@veprbl veprbl removed this from the 1.6.0 milestone Sep 27, 2023
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
### Briefly, what does this PR introduce?

This is a subset of #970, that removes use of SimID and RecID fields
(while switching to comparisons of full object id's instead of just the
indices).
In principle, we could even drop `.getObjectID()` in comparisons and
just use `Object::operator==`
https://github.com/AIDASoft/podio/blob/400f4f06bef3e7666c71e31be579ec715c412b8a/python/templates/macros/implementations.jinja2#L160,
which relies on pointer comparison instead.

### What kind of change does this PR introduce?
- [ ] Bug fix (issue #__)
- [ ] New feature (issue #__)
- [ ] Documentation update
- [ ] Other: __

### Please check if this PR fulfills the following:
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added
- [ ] Documentation has been added / updated
- [ ] Changes have been communicated to collaborators

### Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users
need to make to their code?
No

### Does this PR change default behavior?
No
ajentsch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2024
### Briefly, what does this PR introduce?

This is a subset of #970, that removes use of SimID and RecID fields
(while switching to comparisons of full object id's instead of just the
indices).
In principle, we could even drop `.getObjectID()` in comparisons and
just use `Object::operator==`
https://github.com/AIDASoft/podio/blob/400f4f06bef3e7666c71e31be579ec715c412b8a/python/templates/macros/implementations.jinja2#L160,
which relies on pointer comparison instead.

### What kind of change does this PR introduce?
- [ ] Bug fix (issue #__)
- [ ] New feature (issue #__)
- [ ] Documentation update
- [ ] Other: __

### Please check if this PR fulfills the following:
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added
- [ ] Documentation has been added / updated
- [ ] Changes have been communicated to collaborators

### Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users
need to make to their code?
No

### Does this PR change default behavior?
No
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: calorimetry relates to calorimetry topic: PID Relates to PID reconstruction
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant