Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[20508] TCP first message loss (backport #4454) #4562

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Mar 15, 2024

Description

In the initial TCP logical port negotiation some logical port requests were missing. This would not prevent communication as those remaining requests would be sent on the first data sent to that logical port. However, that data would be discarded.

With this PR all discovered logical ports are requested on initialization and the first data would not need to be discarded.

@Mergifyio backport 2.13.x 2.12.x 2.10.x 2.6.x

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • The code follows the style guidelines of this project.
  • Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally
  • Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.
  • Changes are ABI compatible.
  • Changes are API compatible.
  • N/A New feature has been added to the versions.md file (if applicable).
  • New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.
    Related documentation PR: [20508] TCP first message loss Fast-DDS-docs#699
  • Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #4454 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

@mergify mergify bot added the conflicts Backport PR wich git cherry pick failed label Mar 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Mar 15, 2024

Cherry-pick of 8103cf0 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/2.10.x/pr-4454
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/2.10.x'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 8103cf042.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   src/cpp/rtps/attributes/RTPSParticipantAttributes.cpp
	modified:   src/cpp/rtps/transport/TCPChannelResource.cpp
	modified:   src/cpp/rtps/transport/TCPChannelResource.h
	modified:   src/cpp/rtps/transport/tcp/RTCPMessageManager.cpp
	modified:   test/blackbox/api/dds-pim/PubSubReader.hpp
	modified:   test/blackbox/api/dds-pim/PubSubWriter.hpp
	modified:   test/blackbox/api/fastrtps_deprecated/PubSubReader.hpp
	modified:   test/blackbox/api/fastrtps_deprecated/PubSubWriter.hpp
	modified:   test/unittest/transport/TCPv4Tests.cpp
	modified:   test/unittest/transport/mock/MockTCPv4Transport.h
	modified:   test/unittest/transport/mock/MockTCPv6Transport.h

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   include/fastdds/rtps/transport/TCPTransportDescriptor.h
	both modified:   include/fastrtps/xmlparser/XMLParserCommon.h
	both modified:   resources/xsd/fastRTPS_profiles.xsd
	both modified:   src/cpp/rtps/transport/TCPTransportInterface.cpp
	both modified:   src/cpp/rtps/transport/TCPTransportInterface.h
	both modified:   src/cpp/rtps/xmlparser/XMLParser.cpp
	both modified:   src/cpp/rtps/xmlparser/XMLParserCommon.cpp
	both modified:   test/blackbox/common/BlackboxTestsTransportTCP.cpp
	both modified:   test/mock/rtps/TCPTransportDescriptor/fastrtps/transport/TCPTransportDescriptor.h
	both modified:   test/system/tools/xmlvalidation/XMLTesterExample_profile.xml
	both modified:   test/system/tools/xmlvalidation/all_profile.xml
	both modified:   test/unittest/transport/TCPv6Tests.cpp
	both modified:   test/unittest/xmlparser/XMLParserTests.cpp

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

@mergify mergify bot mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2024
13 tasks
@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso added this to the v2.10.4 milestone Mar 15, 2024
@JesusPoderoso
Copy link
Contributor

@jepemi could you address the conflicts, please?

(If you don't mind, try to remove the conflicts label before pushing the fix, so GitHub CI gets triggered)

@jepemi jepemi force-pushed the mergify/bp/2.10.x/pr-4454 branch from e7ca164 to 4e08209 Compare April 1, 2024 08:31
@jepemi jepemi removed the conflicts Backport PR wich git cherry pick failed label Apr 1, 2024
@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso reopened this Apr 1, 2024
@jepemi jepemi force-pushed the mergify/bp/2.10.x/pr-4454 branch from 4e08209 to bf8ad84 Compare April 1, 2024 09:01
MiguelCompany
MiguelCompany previously approved these changes Apr 1, 2024
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany added the ci-pending PR which CI is running label Apr 1, 2024
@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Member

@richiprosima Please test this

@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Member

@Mergifyio rebase

Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Apr 7, 2024

rebase

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany self-requested a review April 7, 2024 11:17
@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Member

@jepemi Test XMLParserTests.parseXMLTransportData has failed in all platforms. Could you take a look?

Signed-off-by: Jesus Perez <[email protected]>
@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Member

@richiprosima Please test this

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany merged commit 407a93b into 2.10.x Apr 10, 2024
12 of 15 checks passed
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the mergify/bp/2.10.x/pr-4454 branch April 10, 2024 06:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci-pending PR which CI is running
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants