-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(WIP): adding CreateAccount Operation #100
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent code changes significantly enhance account operation management by introducing a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant WebServer
participant Sequencer
participant Storage
User->>WebServer: Submit OperationInput
WebServer->>Sequencer: Validate and queue update
Sequencer->>Storage: Update hashchain with Operation
Storage-->>Sequencer: Confirm update
Sequencer-->>WebServer: Operation processed
WebServer-->>User: Response
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (8)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
Additional comments not posted (25)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/utils.rs (1)
Inconsistent usage of
ChainEntry
andHashChainEntry
.The codebase shows inconsistent usage of
ChainEntry
andHashChainEntry
. Specifically:
ChainEntry
is still present insrc/storage.rs
.HashChainEntry
is used insrc/zk_snark.rs
.Please review and update the codebase to ensure consistent usage of
HashChainEntry
.
- Files to review:
src/storage.rs
src/zk_snark.rs
Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-13
:
Verify consistency of new data structure usage.The removal of
ChainEntry
and possible shift toHashchainEntry
should be consistent throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `HashchainEntry` instead of `ChainEntry`. # Test: Search for `ChainEntry` in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type rust 'ChainEntry'Length of output: 1025
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `ChainEntry` and `HashChainEntry` in the codebase. # Test: Search for all occurrences of `ChainEntry` and `HashChainEntry` in the codebase to verify consistency. rg --type rust 'ChainEntry' rg --type rust 'HashChainEntry'Length of output: 1340
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/node_types/sequencer.rs (1)
2-10
: Unused Imports.The imports for
std::self
,str::FromStr
, andtime::Duration
are not used in the code.Consider removing these unused imports to keep the code clean and maintainable.
0ba2bee
to
c65b99f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
References adr-002: #96