Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove ref-names from .git_archival.txt #2253

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 13, 2024

Conversation

njzjz-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@njzjz-bot njzjz-bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Removing ref-names is now suggested by setuptools-scm, per https://setuptools-scm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage/#git-archives, as it may lead to the git archive checksum changing.

Generated by the task: njzjz-bot/njzjz-bot#6.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed the unused ref-names field in the .git_archival.txt file for cleaner archival metadata.

Removing ref-names is now suggested by setuptools-scm, per https://setuptools-scm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage/#git-archives, as it may lead to the git archive checksum changing.

Generated by the task: njzjz-bot/njzjz-bot#6.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent modification involves simplifying the .git_archival.txt by eliminating the ref-names field. This update does not impact the declaration or exposure of any public or exported entities within the project.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.git_archival.txt Removed the ref-names field from the file.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.04%. Comparing base (25d61e5) to head (dbe8c2f).
Report is 20 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2253   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.04%   95.04%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1432     1432           
=======================================
  Hits         1361     1361           
  Misses         71       71           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 7, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2253 will not alter performance

Comparing njzjz-bot:fix-git-archive (dbe8c2f) with master (25d61e5)

Summary

✅ 8 untouched benchmarks

@njzjz njzjz enabled auto-merge July 12, 2024 23:49
@njzjz njzjz added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:master with commit 83422b9 Jul 13, 2024
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants