Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge #1662 to devel #1669

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Nov 15, 2024

#1662 was wrongly merged into master.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced input generation for LAMMPS to accommodate electron temperature settings.
    • Added a new parameter, use_ele_temp, for improved flexibility in input handling.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured correct retrieval and passing of the use_ele_temp value during model deviation tasks.

in previous version, if we use `template` in model deviation process,
the generated LAMMPS input file would neglect fparam-dependence in DP
model, as
```
pair_style      deepmd ../graph.000.pb ../graph.001.pb ../graph.002.pb ../graph.003.pb out_freq 10 out_file model_devi.out 
pair_coeff      * *
```



here we fixed this problem, as 
```
pair_style      deepmd ../graph.000.pb ../graph.001.pb ../graph.002.pb ../graph.003.pb out_freq 10 out_file model_devi.out fparam ${ELE_TEMP}
pair_coeff      * *

```

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced the LAMMPS input model to support configurations based on
electron temperature settings.
- Added flexibility in handling different input scenarios with the
introduction of a new parameter.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved compatibility checks for the specified DeepMD version in the
input model construction.

- **Documentation**
- Updated comments for clarity regarding the new functionality and
parameter usage.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 49.58%. Comparing base (47a23b3) to head (6943db5).
Report is 64 commits behind head on devel.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
dpgen/generator/run.py 94.73% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #1669      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.50%   49.58%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          83       83              
  Lines       14818    14820       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         7336     7349      +13     
+ Misses       7482     7471      -11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the revise_lmp_input_model function in the dpgen/generator/run.py file by adding a new parameter, use_ele_temp, which allows for conditional formatting of the LAMMPS input based on its value. The make_model_devi function is also updated to ensure the new parameter is correctly passed to revise_lmp_input_model. These changes enhance the function's capability to accommodate variations in electron temperature settings during input generation.

Changes

File Change Summary
dpgen/generator/run.py Updated revise_lmp_input_model to include use_ele_temp parameter and modified internal logic for LAMMPS input formatting. Updated make_model_devi to retrieve and pass use_ele_temp from job data.

Possibly related PRs

  • support fparam in lmp template #1662: This PR modifies the revise_lmp_input_model function in the same file, adding the use_ele_temp parameter and altering the function's logic to conditionally format the LAMMPS input based on this parameter, directly relating to the changes made in the main PR.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
dpgen/generator/run.py (1)

1008-1010: Add docstring for the new use_ele_temp parameter.

The function signature has been updated but lacks documentation for the new parameter. Consider adding parameter description:

def revise_lmp_input_model(
    lmp_lines, task_model_list, trj_freq, deepmd_version="1", use_ele_temp=0
):
+    """
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    use_ele_temp : int, optional
+        Controls electron temperature handling:
+        0: Disabled (default)
+        1: Enable with fparam
+        2: Enable with aparam
+    """
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2db0fa and 6943db5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • dpgen/generator/run.py (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
dpgen/generator/run.py

[warning] 1032-1032: dpgen/generator/run.py#L1032
Added line #L1032 was not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (2)
dpgen/generator/run.py (2)

1019-1033: LGTM! Clean implementation of electron temperature support.

The conditional logic correctly handles the electron temperature parameter by adding fparam ${ELE_TEMP} to the pair_style command when enabled. The implementation is clean and consistent with the requirements.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 1032-1032: dpgen/generator/run.py#L1032
Added line #L1032 was not covered by tests


Line range hint 1303-1440: LGTM! Proper propagation of electron temperature parameter.

The electron temperature parameter is correctly propagated to the revise_lmp_input_model function calls. The implementation maintains consistency across the codebase.

@njzjz
Copy link
Member Author

njzjz commented Nov 15, 2024

It looks that the CI is broken again...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants