-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix input table jpy restriction #5260
Merged
Merged
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0f386a9
Fix input table jpy restriction
arman-ddl e44039f
Remove unnecessary jpy type
arman-ddl d9db20b
Merge branch 'main' into arman_input_table_fix
arman-ddl cb2792d
Wrap java object with the most specific wrapper
jmao-denver 6e9e9e3
Fix docstring format issue
jmao-denver 0a1cc20
Apply suggestions from code review
jmao-denver 42765af
Respond to review comments
jmao-denver 302321f
Tiny coding formatting issue
jmao-denver b143ab7
Update py/server/deephaven/_wrapper.py
jmao-denver 672a2ed
Add one more test case
jmao-denver 319a68d
Empty Commit to force rerun of CI
jmao-denver 47e866c
Respond to latest review comments
jmao-denver File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
chipkent marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Presumably, this is slower than the existing behavior. The only place I can imagine where that might matter is something like a
PartitionedTable.transform
with a Python function. Does the Java constituentTable
get wrapped automatically as a PythonTable
wrapper, and if so , is it slow enough to matter?@jmao-denver you might need to test this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, they are not. When requested (e.g. via. constituent_tables()), the constituent tables are explicitly wrapped in Table, not through this auto wrapping facility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that addresses my concern. I am talking about when you pass a Python function (adapted to Java) to
transform
.deephaven.table.PartitionedTable.transform
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some quick/minimal testing, ~2 - 4 % slower, the more constituent tables, the slower, which is kinda expected (more wrapping):
Before:
After: