Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add java client TableServiceAsync #4756
Add java client TableServiceAsync #4756
Changes from 4 commits
27b3268
d083cd9
9c572c4
8a0079c
373e3d1
a1e305c
9597885
8eeb8c9
cfda32f
e799295
a4ed50b
8879935
2f0261e
adb9807
fe42b00
11e3453
b90fa27
45d1e6f
ef3e4c8
09a0b13
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have the potential for state leak if the user calls close without calling send. Do we need to clean those up? What about on errors?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. I've added some new logic to handle the case where the user does not call send. After sent, any errors are the handled by respective
io.deephaven.client.impl.ExportRequest.listener
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand we want this to avoid CME's on remove during an iteration. Can we build a list to remove and do a removeAll instead? I'm worried about adding COW data structures with user-facing adds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I more thoroughly traced exactly the part that was causing concurrent mod, and it was actually the mitigation; now that the Batch / ETCR race has been fixed, I can get rid of the mitigation and revert this change.