Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added example for retrieving bulk deserialized items in dotnet-sdk repo #3843

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

WhitWaldo
Copy link
Contributor

@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo commented Oct 23, 2023

Thank you for helping make the Dapr documentation better!

Please follow this checklist before submitting:

  • Commits are signed with Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO - learn more)
  • Read the contribution guide
  • Commands include options for Linux, MacOS, and Windows within codetabs
  • New file and folder names are globally unique
  • Page references use shortcodes instead of markdown or URL links
  • Images use HTML style and have alternative text
  • Places where multiple code/command options are given have codetabs

In addition, please fill out the following to help reviewers understand this pull request:

Description

Added example to .NET documentation demonstrating changes implemented for dapr/dotnet-sdk#1172 alongside existing example. Really just copied/pasted the first example, added the Widget seen in the unit tests and tweaked to accommodate, so not a major change.

Issue reference

dapr/dotnet-sdk#1172

@WhitWaldo
Copy link
Contributor Author

After giving the contribution guide a second pass, I just noticed the warning indicating that all Dapr sample code should be in separate files and not inlined. I simply copied from what was already there, but if this is the preferred guidance, I'd be happy to redo the PR accordingly.

@hhunter-ms
Copy link
Collaborator

After giving the contribution guide a second pass, I just noticed the warning indicating that all Dapr sample code should be in separate files and not inlined. I simply copied from what was already there, but if this is the preferred guidance, I'd be happy to redo the PR accordingly.

I can clarify this in the contributing guide, but this method in your PR is totally fine! Thanks for checking

@github-actions
Copy link

Stale PR, paging all reviewers

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 30, 2023
@WhitWaldo
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not entirely sure what the process is to keep from merging this just yet because while I've created the PR for the .NET SDK to implement the underlying, it hasn't itself been merged. Probably best to wait to merge this until that is itself merged too!

@hhunter-ms hhunter-ms added waiting-on-code-pr The code PR needs to be merged before the docs are updated and removed stale labels Oct 30, 2023
@hhunter-ms
Copy link
Collaborator

@WhitWaldo added a label for waiting on code! thanks for the heads up

@hhunter-ms hhunter-ms modified the milestones: 1.14, 1.13 Feb 15, 2024
@hhunter-ms hhunter-ms added the P2 label Feb 15, 2024
@WhitWaldo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hhunter-ms This is good to go as the code PR has been accepted and merged.

WhitWaldo and others added 2 commits February 17, 2024 01:14
…ate-management/howto-get-save-state.md

Co-authored-by: Hannah Hunter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Whit Waldo <[email protected]>
@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo force-pushed the bulk-retrieval-deserialization branch from 5f98947 to 047e71c Compare February 17, 2024 06:14
@hhunter-ms hhunter-ms removed the waiting-on-code-pr The code PR needs to be merged before the docs are updated label Feb 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@msfussell msfussell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hhunter-ms hhunter-ms merged commit 8ccc3df into dapr:v1.13 Feb 21, 2024
4 checks passed
@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo deleted the bulk-retrieval-deserialization branch February 21, 2024 21:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants