-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update usability support for RHEL7 #75
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Support for CA certs
This works for me : I can use an existing server's key/cert in order to clone the repos it has access to using mrepo (and lftp, since it's https URLs). |
I'll give it a try as well. Can you still clone older repos as well with this adapted code? |
Hello It seems to work to clone the repo but the command "mrepo -u -v" does not exit, Strace shows a timeout |
It also does not cleanup older versions of the same package. |
Found a way to cleanup using repomanage So script seems to work like this /usr/bin/mrepo -uvvv |tee /root/mrepo-output & Kind regards |
Previous script is based on 8 channels (extra, supplementary,...). Therefore the 8 iterations |
I was able to resolve the issues with lftp hanging, finally without the script wrapper for mrepo. This is by changing the /etc/lftp.conf to include the following reasonable values to tolerate small disruptions, but to give up and move on at the end of the file transfers: |
I'll give this a try and let you know |
Hello This seems to work, althought it takes more time. Maybe I should reduce net:max-retries But did anyone find a solution where lftp only downloads the latest version of a package and not all as seen below? |
I do lots of post processing after mrepo runs. I would stick with repomanage to do the work. Dropping the retries down, and the timeout will speed things up, however it will be less tolerant of network interruptions. |
Hi @dagwieers Are you still maintaining this? |
I see no official centos7 release rpm for mrepo. So it is safe to use mrepo-el6 for the same? |
Hello
I think it’s no problem to use mrepo-el6 on centos7.
I don’t know whether there is still development being done on mrepo
Kind regards
Werner Maes
Van: Abhishek Kataria [mailto:[email protected]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 24 januari 2017 3:31
Aan: dagwieers/mrepo <[email protected]>
CC: wernermaes <[email protected]>; Comment <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: Re: [dagwieers/mrepo] Update usability support for RHEL7 (#75)
I see no official centos7 release rpm for mrepo. So it is safe to use mrepo-el6 for the same?
Where can I get one for el7? Is there any alternatives I can use?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#75 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AILhnd0PJvrv-FYPvSEvhWBlkI4gDS-qks5rVWJcgaJpZM4CULDS>.
{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/dagwieers/mrepo","title":"dagwieers/mrepo","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/dagwieers/mrepo"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@AbhishekKataria in #75: I see no official centos7 release rpm for mrepo. So it is safe to use mrepo-el6 for the same? \r\nWhere can I get one for el7? Is there any alternatives I can use?"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"#75 (comment)"}}}
|
Hi Werner, Thanks for your answer. I appreciate it. |
I used the software on rhel7 almost 2 years ago, it worked well. I had to
compile and build an install from source. If you get stuck I still have my
notes.
…On Jan 24, 2017 12:09 PM, "Abhishek Kataria" ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Werner, Thanks for your answer. I appreciate it.
Abhishek
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#75 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJmYmubr3fyseJSw4x7xsSqbPv_8-Xd5ks5rVj5mgaJpZM4CULDS>
.
|
IBM Power line of processors now includes the architecture ppc46le with matching architecture identifiers in repository URLs. Add value of ppc64le to archs so mrepo will view this value as a valid architecture when used in configuration files.
…ture Add support for IBM ppc64le architecture.
Added dist's options: sslkey, sslcert.
INFO: #71