[DEMO] markdown #1198
[DEMO] markdown #1198
Conversation
alex-Arc
commented
Aug 29, 2024
alex-Arc
commented
WalkthroughThe changes introduced enhancements to various components and services in the application, focusing on the integration of custom field types, particularly supporting Markdown input. Key modifications include the addition of new properties and functionalities in components like Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
alex-Arc
force-pushed
the
feat-markdown
branch
from
d930acd
to
e467e6c
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
apps/client/package.jsonis excluded by none and included by nonepackages/types/src/definitions/core/CustomFields.type.tsis excluded by none and included by nonepackages/types/src/index.tsis excluded by none and included by nonepnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamland included by none
Files selected for processing (13)
- apps/client/src/common/components/input/markdown/MarkdownArea.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/app-settings/panel/feature-settings-panel/custom-fields/CustomFieldEntry.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/app-settings/panel/feature-settings-panel/custom-fields/CustomFieldForm.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/app-settings/panel/feature-settings-panel/custom-fields/CustomFields.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/cuesheet/cuesheet-table-elements/EditableCell.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/cuesheet/cuesheetCols.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/rundown/event-editor/EventEditor.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/rundown/event-editor/composite/EventTextArea.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/theme/ontimeCheckbox.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/theme/ontimeTextInputs.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/theme/theme.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/server/src/services/rundown-service/rundownCache.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/server/src/utils/parserFunctions.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (35)
apps/client/src/theme/ontimeTextInputs.ts (1)
53-59: LGTM!The
containerStylesconstant is consistent with the existing styles in the file.apps/client/src/theme/ontimeCheckbox.ts (1)
35-67: LGTM!The
ontimeCheckboxWhiteconstant is consistent with the existing styles in the file.apps/client/src/features/app-settings/panel/feature-settings-panel/custom-fields/CustomFieldEntry.tsx (3)
17-17: LGTM!The addition of the
typeproperty enhances the functionality of theCustomFieldEntrycomponent.
23-23: LGTM!The destructuring assignment is correctly updated to include the
typeproperty.
Line range hint
40-53: LGTM!The usage of the
typeproperty is correctly implemented.apps/client/src/features/cuesheet/cuesheet-table-elements/EditableCell.tsx (3)
5-5: LGTM!The import statement for
MarkdownAreais correct and necessary for the new functionality.
9-9: LGTM!The addition of
isMarkdownto theEditableCellPropsinterface is appropriate for the new functionality.
18-18: LGTM!The addition of the
editMarkdownstate variable and the conditional rendering logic forMarkdownAreaare correct and enhance the component's functionality by integrating Markdown support.Also applies to: 23-26, 45-55, 69-69
apps/client/src/features/rundown/event-editor/composite/EventTextArea.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM!The import statement for
MarkdownAreais correct and necessary for the new functionality.
17-17: LGTM!The addition of
isMarkdownto theCountedTextAreaPropsinterface is appropriate for the new functionality.
24-24: LGTM!The addition of the
editMarkdownstate variable and the conditional rendering logic forMarkdownAreaare correct and enhance the component's functionality by integrating Markdown support.Also applies to: 31-34, 37-37, 44-67
apps/client/src/features/app-settings/panel/feature-settings-panel/custom-fields/CustomFields.tsx (2)
76-76: LGTM!The addition of the "Type" column to the table header is appropriate and enhances the information presented to the user.
81-88: LGTM!The update to the
Object.entries(data)mapping to include thetypeproperty is correct and necessary for displaying the new "Type" column in the table.apps/client/src/common/components/input/markdown/MarkdownArea.tsx (4)
1-4: LGTM!The import statements are correct and necessary for the component.
6-12: LGTM!The
MarkdownAreaPropsinterface is well-defined and includes all necessary props.
14-17: LGTM!The
MarkdownAreafunction is well-implemented and follows best practices for React components.
36-87: LGTM!The return statement is well-implemented and follows best practices for React components.
apps/client/src/features/cuesheet/cuesheetCols.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM!The import statement is correct and necessary for the updated functionality.
51-56: LGTM!The
MakeCustomFieldfunction is well-implemented and follows best practices for handling custom fields.
64-64: LGTM!The
makeCuesheetColumnsfunction is well-implemented and follows best practices for creating column definitions.apps/client/src/theme/theme.ts (3)
12-12: LGTM!The import statement is correct and necessary for the updated functionality.
62-63: LGTM!The
Checkboxcomponent configuration is correct and follows best practices for Chakra UI theming.
129-132: LGTM!The
Containercomponent configuration is correct and follows best practices for Chakra UI theming.apps/client/src/features/app-settings/panel/feature-settings-panel/custom-fields/CustomFieldForm.tsx (6)
3-4: LGTM!The new imports are necessary for the new feature.
18-18: LGTM!The addition of the
initialTypeproperty is necessary for the new feature.
22-22: LGTM!The destructuring of the
initialTypeproperty frompropsis necessary for the new feature.
35-39: LGTM!The form's default values have been correctly modified to incorporate the new
typefield.
45-48: LGTM!The
setupSubmitfunction has been correctly updated to accept thetypeparameter.
96-102: LGTM!The addition of the
Selectcomponent is necessary for the new feature.apps/client/src/features/rundown/event-editor/EventEditor.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM!The new import is necessary for the new feature.
123-123: LGTM!The addition of the
isMarkdownprop is necessary for the new feature.apps/server/src/utils/parserFunctions.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM!The new import is necessary for the new feature.
321-321: LGTM!The addition of the
typeproperty is necessary for the new feature.
334-337: LGTM!The expanded validation logic is necessary for the new feature.
apps/server/src/services/rundown-service/rundownCache.ts (1)
Line range hint
287-310: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The removal of the conditional check allows for greater flexibility in editing custom fields, specifically regarding their type. Ensure that all parts of the codebase handle the type change correctly.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified with Tests Present
The
editCustomFieldfunction is used across the codebase, including in test files, which suggests that its behavior is being verified. Ensure that the tests cover scenarios related to type changes to mitigate any potential issues from the recent modifications.
- Files with
editCustomFieldusage:
apps/server/src/services/rundown-service/rundownCache.tsapps/server/src/services/rundown-service/__tests__/rundownCache.test.tsapps/server/src/api-data/custom-fields/customFields.controller.tsapps/client/src/common/api/customFields.tsapps/client/src/features/app-settings/panel/feature-settings-panel/custom-fields/CustomFields.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `editCustomField` handle the type change correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'editCustomField'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `editCustomField` handle the type change correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage without specifying a file type. rg -A 5 'editCustomField'Length of output: 6959
| const markDownChecker = (line: number) => { | ||
| const txtLines = text.split('\n'); | ||
| const activeLine = txtLines[line - 1]; | ||
| const isChecked = activeLine.indexOf('- [x] ') === 0; | ||
| const isNotChecked = activeLine.indexOf('- [ ] ') === 0; | ||
|
|
||
| if (isNotChecked) { | ||
| txtLines[line - 1] = activeLine.replace('- [ ] ', '- [x] '); | ||
| submitHandler(txtLines.join('\n')); | ||
| setText(txtLines.join('\n')); | ||
| } | ||
| if (isChecked) { | ||
| txtLines[line - 1] = activeLine.replace('- [x] ', '- [ ] '); | ||
| submitHandler(txtLines.join('\n')); | ||
| setText(txtLines.join('\n')); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider optimizing the markDownChecker function.
The markDownChecker function can be optimized by combining the two conditions into one.
Apply this diff to optimize the function:
const markDownChecker = (line: number) => {
const txtLines = text.split('\n');
const activeLine = txtLines[line - 1];
const isChecked = activeLine.indexOf('- [x] ') === 0;
const isNotChecked = activeLine.indexOf('- [ ] ') === 0;
- if (isNotChecked) {
- txtLines[line - 1] = activeLine.replace('- [ ] ', '- [x] ');
- submitHandler(txtLines.join('\n'));
- setText(txtLines.join('\n'));
- }
- if (isChecked) {
- txtLines[line - 1] = activeLine.replace('- [x] ', '- [ ] ');
+ if (isNotChecked || isChecked) {
+ txtLines[line - 1] = activeLine.replace(isNotChecked ? '- [ ] ' : '- [x] ', isNotChecked ? '- [x] ' : '- [ ] ');
submitHandler(txtLines.join('\n'));
setText(txtLines.join('\n'));
}
};Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const markDownChecker = (line: number) => { | |
| const txtLines = text.split('\n'); | |
| const activeLine = txtLines[line - 1]; | |
| const isChecked = activeLine.indexOf('- [x] ') === 0; | |
| const isNotChecked = activeLine.indexOf('- [ ] ') === 0; | |
| if (isNotChecked) { | |
| txtLines[line - 1] = activeLine.replace('- [ ] ', '- [x] '); | |
| submitHandler(txtLines.join('\n')); | |
| setText(txtLines.join('\n')); | |
| } | |
| if (isChecked) { | |
| txtLines[line - 1] = activeLine.replace('- [x] ', '- [ ] '); | |
| submitHandler(txtLines.join('\n')); | |
| setText(txtLines.join('\n')); | |
| } | |
| const markDownChecker = (line: number) => { | |
| const txtLines = text.split('\n'); | |
| const activeLine = txtLines[line - 1]; | |
| const isChecked = activeLine.indexOf('- [x] ') === 0; | |
| const isNotChecked = activeLine.indexOf('- [ ] ') === 0; | |
| if (isNotChecked || isChecked) { | |
| txtLines[line - 1] = activeLine.replace(isNotChecked ? '- [ ] ' : '- [x] ', isNotChecked ? '- [x] ' : '- [ ] '); | |
| submitHandler(txtLines.join('\n')); | |
| setText(txtLines.join('\n')); | |
| } | |
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/server/src/models/demoProject.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/server/src/services/rundown-service/tests/rundownCache.test.ts (5 hunks)
- apps/server/src/utils/tests/parserFunctions.test.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (18)
apps/server/src/models/demoProject.ts (2)
381-383: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
386-388: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.apps/server/src/utils/__tests__/parserFunctions.test.ts (8)
2-2: LGTM!The import of
CustomFieldTypeis necessary for the subsequent changes.
281-283: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
289-289: Verify the reason for skipping the test case.Skipping a test case might indicate a shift in testing strategy or a temporary measure. Ensure that this is intentional and documented.
295-297: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
304-306: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
312-314: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
324-326: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
332-335: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.apps/server/src/services/rundown-service/__tests__/rundownCache.test.ts (8)
2-2: LGTM!The import of
CustomFieldTypeis necessary for the subsequent changes.
397-399: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
402-404: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
936-938: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
943-945: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
958-962: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
969-971: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
1011-1013: LGTM!The change enhances type safety by using
CustomFieldType.Stringinstead of a string literal.
