-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(staking): avoid the double iterator close in staking #21823
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
@cool-develope your pull request is missing a changelog! |
Can we add a comment? |
not sure if the comment is needed |
It was mostly in case contributors add this, and we miss it in a PR (as without checking out the code, it makes sense to defer close an iterator). Feel free to ignore if you rather not add it. |
(cherry picked from commit 98eb0b7)
…1823) (#21824) Co-authored-by: cool-developer <[email protected]>
Description
Fixed the small issue of the double iterator being close in staking. The given iterator is closed in
CollectValues
,cosmos-sdk/collections/indexes/helpers.go
Line 93 in bdda21f
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit