Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Prysm #5479

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged

Add Prysm #5479

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

BobboFuxx
Copy link
Contributor

@BobboFuxx BobboFuxx commented Oct 18, 2024

Adding Prysm Network chain.json and IBC

@BobboFuxx BobboFuxx marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2024 01:49
@BobboFuxx BobboFuxx changed the title Add aPRYSM Add Prysm Oct 19, 2024
prysm/chain.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JeremyParish69 JeremyParish69 marked this pull request as draft October 19, 2024 19:34
@TCL0001
Copy link
Contributor

TCL0001 commented Oct 19, 2024

Removed the duplicated Prysm directory created outside of testnets directory, updated IBC.jsons to match that of comments/suggestions made. Updated Prysm description in the assetlist.json

@BobboFuxx BobboFuxx marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2024 22:24
@TCL0001
Copy link
Contributor

TCL0001 commented Oct 22, 2024

IBC files amended

@BobboFuxx BobboFuxx marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 18:56
@TCL0001
Copy link
Contributor

TCL0001 commented Oct 24, 2024

Removed initia, blumbus

@JeremyParish69 JeremyParish69 merged commit 6b87363 into cosmos:master Oct 25, 2024
4 checks passed
{
"$schema": "../../ibc_data.schema.json",
"chain_1": {
"chain_name": "osmosistestnet4",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you should know that osmosistestnet4 isn't really used anymore, and people are generally using osmosistestnet (osmo-test-5) for testnet transactions. I'll double check to see if osmosistestnet4 has actually been halted, but I suspect this was the wrong one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants