Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT MERGE] Test cross compilation #36

Conversation

conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I've rerendered the recipe as instructed in #35.

Here's a checklist to do before merging.

  • Bump the build number if needed.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@leofang leofang changed the title MNT: rerender [DO NOT MERGE] Test cross compilation Apr 17, 2023
@leofang leofang marked this pull request as draft April 17, 2023 14:50
@leofang
Copy link
Member

leofang commented Apr 17, 2023

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@leofang
Copy link
Member

leofang commented Apr 17, 2023

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@leofang
Copy link
Member

leofang commented Apr 17, 2023

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/cuquantum-feedstock/actions/runs/4723842518.

asked on Gitter
@leofang
Copy link
Member

leofang commented Apr 17, 2023

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@leofang
Copy link
Member

leofang commented Apr 25, 2023

Not related to this PR, but I noticed that the .ci_support files are not split for different Python versions, and that's why the CI is slow... Going through emulation just makes it even slower...though it's remedied by cross compiling (this PR).

I am a bit hesitant to get this in, although this works. Reason being the potential maintenance overhead when this is handed to the team. Let me think about it further.

@leofang
Copy link
Member

leofang commented Aug 31, 2023

Superseded by #47.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants