Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] Add latest cling versions(LLVM 16, 18) #333

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aaronj0
Copy link
Collaborator

@aaronj0 aaronj0 commented Oct 21, 2024

No description provided.

@aaronj0 aaronj0 force-pushed the cling-ci branch 2 times, most recently from 4bea50d to ad7fbd7 Compare October 21, 2024 12:42
@mcbarton
Copy link
Collaborator

@aaronj0 You'll need to delete the jobs related to cling and llvm 13, and just keep the job related to llvm 18. If you don't the llvm cache will be overwhelmed.

cppyy: Off
- name: osx14-arm-clang-clang-repl-19
- name: osx14-arm-clang-repl-19
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With the exception of Windows the names of jobs are currently
'operation system'-architechture-compiler-'cling or clang-repl version'

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer easier readability. Compiler backend are either clang-repl or cling. 'clang-clang-repl' does not make sense

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aaronj0 That's fine to do but we need to be consistent, so you've need to drop the msvc and gcc12 from the other jobs for consistency.

os: windows-2022
compiler: msvc
clang-runtime: '13'
clang-runtime: '16'
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove the clang llvm 16 jobs as this will overwhelm the llvm cache. We need to just keep the latest version of llvm with respect to cling.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need both. Cling differs with the LLVM-18 upgrade and ROOT requires this check to be made to support releases >6.32 . I would rather drop clang-repl16

Copy link
Collaborator

@mcbarton mcbarton Oct 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aaronj0 We need to drop one set of jobs. If you think it would be better to drop clang-repl-16 then I am ok with that. We can continue to support those jobs in the other repos for now since they don't have any Windows builds filling up the cache.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.83%. Comparing base (757e7e8) to head (c15d76b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #333      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.27%   73.83%   -0.44%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines        3188     3188              
==========================================
- Hits         2368     2354      -14     
- Misses        820      834      +14     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Interpreter/Compatibility.h 79.43% <ø> (-10.29%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Interpreter/Compatibility.h 79.43% <ø> (-10.29%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@aaronj0 aaronj0 force-pushed the cling-ci branch 2 times, most recently from d289b6a to 6075374 Compare October 24, 2024 13:45
Copy link

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants