Co-teaching episode draft

[stepas-toliautas]

Relevant questions:

• Is this supposed to cover all of co-teaching or just contact team-teaching, covered in CR manual?
• Is it OK to refer to the above-mentioned manual section or it's preferable to mine/ summarize it in the episode?
• What level of depth is envisioned? Since the episode is ~30 min, that would determine whether we add a practical exercise, a discussion on a certain question or leave it out altogether.

[samumantha]

Yay, thank you for getting this started 🔥

Some thoughts about the questions:

Yes, please refer to manuals where appropriate. We are also checking and updating manuals at the moment, so if there is something missing or outdated, now would be the perfect time to point it out or even send a PR to manuals.

About covering all: I'd say no, but it can cover more/other focus than previous materials or the manuals.

Ideally we would have the train the trainer materials as a summary of manuals with links to more in depth materials. But that might be a longer process.

About depth: where possible I'd prefer exercise/discussion over 'lecturing' ; since we have everyone sign up to separate sessions we also have the possibility to ask them to do some pre-task, eg reading the manuals page or some article or watch a video.

For co-teaching episode, maybe we could let them watch short snippets of different examples of how co-teaching can go, from different recordings? Ie developing the take-home message themselves by discussing benefits/challenges of different approaches or so?

[bast]

I would also prefer summary + discussion/exercise over only-lecture format. Perhaps it would be effective to present co-teaching in a co-teaching format?

Referring to manuals is good but I personally like if the material is self-contained. It does not need to repeat what is in the manual but maybe it can summarize it in a self-contained way. But this is not a requirement, just my personal preference.

[samumantha]

We can also adjust the timing for the episodes on day 2, if you have a good exercise that needs more time.

[bast]

Thanks a lot for your work! I merge and we improve with subsequent pull requests?